热门
自我调节疲劳量表中文版测评青年人的效度与信度
文献类型:期刊论文
作者 | 王利刚1![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
刊名 | 中国心理卫生杂志
![]() |
出版日期 | 2015 |
卷号 | 29期号:4页码:290-294 |
关键词 | 自我调节疲劳 信度 效度 心理测量学 |
ISSN号 | 1000-6729 |
其他题名 | Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Self-Regulatory Fatigue Scale in young adults |
产权排序 | 1 |
中文摘要 | 目的:引入自我调节疲劳量表(SRF-S),并在青年人群中对其效度和信度进行检验。方法:选取北京市某高校一年级研究生238名和某国企青年职工315名,通过条目分析、验证性因子分析检验量表的条目鉴别力和结构效度,选用简易应对方式量表(SCSQ)和自我控制双系统量表(DMSC-S)为效标,考察量表的效标关联效度;对研究生样本进行间隔2周的重测,评定量表的重测信度。结果:SRF-S的条目鉴别力良好,各条目与所属分量表的相关在0.38~0.67之间。验证性因子分析结果表明,剔除2个因子载荷低于0.32的条目后,量表的结构效度较好(χ2/df=5.08、RM SEA=0.09、NFI=0.90、NNFI=0.90、CFI=0.92、IFI=0.92、GFI=0.90),各条目的因子载荷在0.37~0.71之间;SRF-S总分及3个分量表得分与消极应对方式、冲动系统得分均呈正相关(r=0.25~0.58,均P<0.001),与积极应对方式和控制系统得分呈负相关(r=-0.22~-0.47,均P<0.001)。总量表的内部一致性α系数为0.84,3个分量表的α系数在0.64~0.69之间;总量表的重测信度为0.73,3个分量表的重测信度在0.62~0.67之间。结论:本研究形成的包含16个条目的自我调节疲劳量表中文版具有较好的效度和信度,适合用于评估我国青年人的自我调节疲劳状况。 |
英文摘要 | Objective:To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Self-Regulatory Fatigue Scale (SRF-S) in Chinese young people. Methods:A sample of 553 young people from a university and a state-owned enterprise was administrated with the SRF-S,the Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ) and the Dual-Mode Self-Control Scale (DMSC-S).Item analysis was conducted to identify valid items and revise the scale.Then the construct validity of the revised scale was tested through confirmatory factor analysis.Finally,a sample of 238 graduate students was retested two weeks later to examine the reliability of the scale. Results:Item analysis showed that the SRF-S had satisfactory item discrimination (r>0.38).Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the whole scale had a three-order factor and good construct validity (χ~2/df=5.08,RMSEA=0.09,NFI=0.90,NNFI=0.90,CFI=0.92,IFI=0.92,GFI=0.90) after removing 2 items with factor loadings lower than 0.32,and the range of factor loading was between 0.37 and 0.71.The SRF-S total and subscale scores were positively correlated with the scores of negative coping and poor control (r=0.25-0.58,Ps<0.001),and were negatively associated with the scores of positive coping and good self-Control (r=-0.22--0.47,Ps<0.001).The Cronbach' s α coefficients were 0.84 for the total scale,and 0.64 to 0.69 for the three subscales,respectively;the test-retest reliability coefficients were 0.73 for the total scale,and 0.62 to 0.67 for the three subscales,respectively. Conclusion:It suggests that the Chinese version of SFR-S could be used as an effective and reliable tool for assessing self-regulatory fatigue state among Chinese young people. |
学科主题 | 心理测量 |
收录类别 | CSCD |
语种 | 中文 |
CSCD记录号 | CSCD:5403524 |
源URL | [http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/15171] ![]() |
专题 | 心理研究所_中国科学院心理健康重点实验室 |
作者单位 | 1.中国科学院心理研究所, 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室, 北京, 100101 2.南京师范大学强化培养学院, 南京, 210023 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | 王利刚,张静怡,王佳,等. 自我调节疲劳量表中文版测评青年人的效度与信度[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志,2015,29(4):290-294. |
APA | 王利刚,张静怡,王佳,陶婷,樊春雷,&高文斌.(2015).自我调节疲劳量表中文版测评青年人的效度与信度.中国心理卫生杂志,29(4),290-294. |
MLA | 王利刚,et al."自我调节疲劳量表中文版测评青年人的效度与信度".中国心理卫生杂志 29.4(2015):290-294. |
入库方式: OAI收割
来源:心理研究所
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。