中国科学院机构知识库网格
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid
Comparison of Eight Techniques for Reconstructing Multi-Satellite Sensor Time-Series NDVI Data Sets in the Heihe River Basin, China (SCI)

文献类型:期刊论文

作者Geng L. Y. ; Ma M. G. ; Wang X. F. ; Yu W. P. ; Jia S. Z. ; Wang H. B.
刊名Remote Sensing
出版日期2014
卷号6期号:3页码:2024-2049
英文摘要More than 20 techniques have been developed to de-noise time-series vegetation index data from different satellite sensors to reconstruct long time-series data sets. Although many studies have compared Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) noise-reduction techniques, few studies have compared these techniques systematically and comprehensively. This study tested eight techniques for smoothing different vegetation types using different types of multi-temporal NDVI data (Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) (Global Inventory Modeling and Map Studies (GIMMS) and Pathfinder AVHRR Land (PAL), Satellite Pour l' Observation de la Terre (SPOT) VEGETATION (VGT), and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) (Terra)) with the ultimate purpose of determining the best reconstruction technique for each type of vegetation captured with four satellite sensors. These techniques include the modified best index slope extraction (M-BISE) technique, the Savitzky-Golay (S-G) technique, the mean value iteration filter (MVI) technique, the asymmetric Gaussian (A-G) technique, the double logistic (D-L) technique, the changing-weight filter (CW) technique, the interpolation for data reconstruction (IDR) technique, and the Whittaker smoother (WS) technique. These techniques were evaluated by calculating the root mean square error (RMSE), the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), and the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). The results indicate that the S-G, CW, and WS techniques perform better than the other tested techniques, while the IDR, M-BISE, and MVI techniques performed worse than the other techniques. The best de-noise technique varies with different vegetation types and NDVI data sources. The S-G performs best in most situations. In addition, the CW and WS are effective techniques that were exceeded only by the S-G technique. The assessment results are consistent in terms of the three evaluation indexes for GIMMS, PAL, and SPOT data in the study area, but not for the MODIS data. The study will be very helpful for choosing reconstruction techniques for long time-series data sets.
收录类别SCI
公开日期2015-12-24
源URL[http://ir.casnw.net/handle/362004/24968]  
专题寒区旱区环境与工程研究所_中科院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所(未分类)_期刊论文
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Geng L. Y.,Ma M. G.,Wang X. F.,et al. Comparison of Eight Techniques for Reconstructing Multi-Satellite Sensor Time-Series NDVI Data Sets in the Heihe River Basin, China (SCI)[J]. Remote Sensing,2014,6(3):2024-2049.
APA Geng L. Y.,Ma M. G.,Wang X. F.,Yu W. P.,Jia S. Z.,&Wang H. B..(2014).Comparison of Eight Techniques for Reconstructing Multi-Satellite Sensor Time-Series NDVI Data Sets in the Heihe River Basin, China (SCI).Remote Sensing,6(3),2024-2049.
MLA Geng L. Y.,et al."Comparison of Eight Techniques for Reconstructing Multi-Satellite Sensor Time-Series NDVI Data Sets in the Heihe River Basin, China (SCI)".Remote Sensing 6.3(2014):2024-2049.

入库方式: OAI收割

来源:寒区旱区环境与工程研究所

浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。