中国科学院机构知识库网格
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid
Comparisons between centrifuge and numerical modeling results for slope toppling failure

文献类型:期刊论文

作者Chen ZY; Gong WJ; Ma GW; Wang J(王杰); He L; Xing YC; Xing JY
刊名SCIENCE CHINA-TECHNOLOGICAL SCIENCES
出版日期2015-09
卷号58期号:9页码:1497-1508
通讯作者邮箱gwj6641118@buaa.edu.cn
ISSN号1674-7321
关键词rock slope model toppling failure rock-bridge centrifuge test continuum based discrete element method discontinuous deformation analysis
通讯作者Gong, WJ (reprint author), Beihang Univ, Sch Transportat Sci & Engn, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China.
产权排序[Chen ZuYu; Gong WenJun] Beihang Univ, Sch Transportat Sci & Engn, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China; [Ma GuoWei] Univ Western Australia, Sch Civil & Resource Engn, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia; [Wang Jie] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Mech, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China; [Chen ZuYu; Xing YiChuan] China Inst Water Resources & Hydropower, Dept Geotech Engn, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China; [He Lei] Monash Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia; [Xing JianYing] Yellow River Engn Consulting Co Ltd, Zhengzhou 450003, Peoples R China
中文摘要This paper presents series studies on the toppling mechanism by centrifuge tests and numerical simulations. Two different discrete element methods, i.e., the continuum-based discrete element method (CDEM) and the discontinuous deformation analysis (DDA), are adopted. The modeling results show that both the methods can accurately capture the failure modes of the centrifuge tests, including three distinct zones and two failure surfaces. Comparisons are made between the physical test and numerical simulation results. The critical inclination angle of the tilting table where the slope models are fixed on can be moderately predicted by the two methods, with different degrees of precision. The error between the test results and the simulated results is within 1% for the slope models without rock-bridges by both CDEM and DDA. However, it is amplified for the staggered-joint models that simulate the rock-bridges. With DDA, the average error is about 5%, and the maximum error is up to 17%. While with CDEM, the errors for the aligned-joint models are ranged from 1% to 6%, and it is from 10% to 29% for the staggered- joint models. The two numerical methods show the capability in simulating toppling failure of blocky rock mass with and without rock-bridges. The model with rock-bridges which provides a certain bending resistance is more stable than the one without any rock-bridge. In addition, the two failure surfaces were observed, which is different from the common understanding that only one failure surface appears.
类目[WOS]Engineering, Multidisciplinary ; Materials Science, Multidisciplinary
分类号二类/Q2
研究领域[WOS]Engineering ; Materials Science
关键词[WOS]DISCONTINUOUS DEFORMATION ANALYSIS ; DISCRETE ELEMENT METHOD ; ROCK SLOPES ; PROGRESSIVE FAILURE ; TESTS ; DDA
收录类别SCI ; EI ; CSCD
原文出处http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11431-015-5889-x
语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000360935100003
源URL[http://dspace.imech.ac.cn/handle/311007/58424]  
专题力学研究所_流固耦合系统力学重点实验室(2012-)
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Chen ZY,Gong WJ,Ma GW,et al. Comparisons between centrifuge and numerical modeling results for slope toppling failure[J]. SCIENCE CHINA-TECHNOLOGICAL SCIENCES,2015,58(9):1497-1508.
APA Chen ZY.,Gong WJ.,Ma GW.,王杰.,He L.,...&Xing JY.(2015).Comparisons between centrifuge and numerical modeling results for slope toppling failure.SCIENCE CHINA-TECHNOLOGICAL SCIENCES,58(9),1497-1508.
MLA Chen ZY,et al."Comparisons between centrifuge and numerical modeling results for slope toppling failure".SCIENCE CHINA-TECHNOLOGICAL SCIENCES 58.9(2015):1497-1508.

入库方式: OAI收割

来源:力学研究所

浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。