Comments on three comparative analyses of stem taper models published in Journal of Mountain Science in 2014-2016
文献类型:期刊论文
作者 | Harold E. BURKHART |
刊名 | Journal of Mountain Science
![]() |
出版日期 | 2016-03 |
卷号 | 13期号:3页码:534-535 |
关键词 | Comments Journal of Mountain Science |
ISSN号 | 1672-6316 |
通讯作者 | Harold E. BURKHART |
英文摘要 | Recently the Journal of Mountain Science published three papers (Lumbres et al. 2014; Jung et al. 2015; Lumbres et al. 2016) that compared selected taper models for bias and precision when estimating upper stem diameters for various tree species. The purpose of this commentary is to point out the consequences of the choice of the variable to be predicted when fitting taper equations and the importance of consistency in the definition of the dependent variable when making comparisons among alternative models. |
收录类别 | SCI |
语种 | 英语 |
源URL | [http://ir.imde.ac.cn/handle/131551/14096] ![]() |
专题 | 成都山地灾害与环境研究所_Journal of Mountain Science _Journal of Mountain Science-2016_Vol13 No.3 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Harold E. BURKHART. Comments on three comparative analyses of stem taper models published in Journal of Mountain Science in 2014-2016[J]. Journal of Mountain Science,2016,13(3):534-535. |
APA | Harold E. BURKHART.(2016).Comments on three comparative analyses of stem taper models published in Journal of Mountain Science in 2014-2016.Journal of Mountain Science,13(3),534-535. |
MLA | Harold E. BURKHART."Comments on three comparative analyses of stem taper models published in Journal of Mountain Science in 2014-2016".Journal of Mountain Science 13.3(2016):534-535. |
入库方式: OAI收割
来源:成都山地灾害与环境研究所
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。