中国科学院机构知识库网格
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid
ASSESSING THE ACCURACY OF SRTM DEM AND ASTER GDEM DATASETS FOR THE COASTAL ZONE OF SHANDONG PROVINCE, EASTERN CHINA

文献类型:期刊论文

作者Luan, SP; Hou, XY; Wang, YT
刊名POLISH MARITIME RESEARCH
出版日期2015
卷号22页码:15-20
关键词Elevation errors SRTM DEM ASTER DEM
ISSN号1233-2585
产权排序[Hou, Xiyong] Chinese Acad Sci, Yantai Inst Coastal Zone Res, Yantai, Peoples R China; [Wang, Yetang] Shandong Normal Univ, Coll Populat Resources & Environm, Jinan, Peoples R China; [Luan, Shaopeng] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China; [Luan, Shaopeng] Geomat Ctr Yantai City, Yantai, Peoples R China
通讯作者Luan, SP (reprint author), Chinese Acad Sci, Yantai Inst Coastal Zone Res, Yantai, Peoples R China.
中文摘要This study assessed the performance of recently released 3 arc second SRTM DEM version 4.1 by CSI-CGIAR and 1 arc second ASTER GDEM version 1 and version 2 by METI-NASA in comparison with ground control points from 1:50000 digital line graphs for the coastal zone of Shandong Province, Easter China. The vertical accuracy of SRTM DEM is 13.74 m root mean square error (RMSE), and GDEM version 1 reaches 24.11 m RMSE. Version 2 of ASTER GDEM shows better performance than version 1 and SRTM DEM with a RMSE of 12.12 m. A strong correlation of the magnitude of elevation error with slope and elevation is identified, with lager error magnitudes in the steeper slopes and higher elevations. Taking into account slope and elevation has the potential to considerably improve the accuracy of the SRTM DEM and GDEM version 1 products. However, this improvement for GDEM version 2 can be negligible due to their limited explanatory power for the DEM elevation errors.
英文摘要This study assessed the performance of recently released 3 arc second SRTM DEM version 4.1 by CSI-CGIAR and 1 arc second ASTER GDEM version 1 and version 2 by METI-NASA in comparison with ground control points from 1:50000 digital line graphs for the coastal zone of Shandong Province, Easter China. The vertical accuracy of SRTM DEM is 13.74 m root mean square error (RMSE), and GDEM version 1 reaches 24.11 m RMSE. Version 2 of ASTER GDEM shows better performance than version 1 and SRTM DEM with a RMSE of 12.12 m. A strong correlation of the magnitude of elevation error with slope and elevation is identified, with lager error magnitudes in the steeper slopes and higher elevations. Taking into account slope and elevation has the potential to considerably improve the accuracy of the SRTM DEM and GDEM version 1 products. However, this improvement for GDEM version 2 can be negligible due to their limited explanatory power for the DEM elevation errors.
研究领域[WOS]Engineering
关键词[WOS]DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS ; VALIDATION ; TOPOGRAPHY ; IMPACT ; RADAR ; FIELD
收录类别SCI
语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000362220200003
源URL[http://ir.yic.ac.cn/handle/133337/9756]  
专题烟台海岸带研究所_海岸带信息集成与综合管理实验室
烟台海岸带研究所_中科院海岸带环境过程与生态修复重点实验室
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Luan, SP,Hou, XY,Wang, YT. ASSESSING THE ACCURACY OF SRTM DEM AND ASTER GDEM DATASETS FOR THE COASTAL ZONE OF SHANDONG PROVINCE, EASTERN CHINA[J]. POLISH MARITIME RESEARCH,2015,22:15-20.
APA Luan, SP,Hou, XY,&Wang, YT.(2015).ASSESSING THE ACCURACY OF SRTM DEM AND ASTER GDEM DATASETS FOR THE COASTAL ZONE OF SHANDONG PROVINCE, EASTERN CHINA.POLISH MARITIME RESEARCH,22,15-20.
MLA Luan, SP,et al."ASSESSING THE ACCURACY OF SRTM DEM AND ASTER GDEM DATASETS FOR THE COASTAL ZONE OF SHANDONG PROVINCE, EASTERN CHINA".POLISH MARITIME RESEARCH 22(2015):15-20.

入库方式: OAI收割

来源:烟台海岸带研究所

浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。