Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions on an Updated Benchmark: 2. Evaluation Methods and General Results
文献类型：期刊论文
| 作者 | LI YAN1; HAN LI1; LIU ZHIHAI1; Wang RX(王任小)1 |
| 刊名 | J. Chem Inf. Model.
 |
| 出版日期 | 2014 |
| 卷号 | 54期号:6页码:1717-1736 |
| 其他题名 | Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions on an Updated Benchmark: 2. Evaluation Methods and General Results |
| 通讯作者 | 王任小 |
| 英文摘要 | Our comparative assessment of scoring functions (CASF) benchmark is created to provide an objective evaluation of current scoring functions. The key idea of CASF is to compare the general performance of scoring functions on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes. In order to avoid testing scoring functions in the context of molecular docking, the scoring process is separated from the docking (or sampling) process by using ensembles of ligand binding poses that are generated in prior. Here, we describe the technical methods and evaluation results of the latest CASF-2013 study. The PDBbind core set (version 2013) was employed as the primary test set in this study, which consists of 195 protein-ligand complexes with high-quality three-dimensional structures and reliable binding constants. A panel of 20 scoring functions, most of which are implemented in main-stream commercial software, were evaluated in terms of "scoring power" (binding affinity prediction), "ranking power" (relative ranking prediction), "docking power" (binding pose prediction), and "screening power" (discrimination of true binders from random molecules). Our results reveal that the performance of these scoring functions is generally more promising in the docking/screening power tests than in the scoring/ranking power tests. Top-ranked scoring functions in the scoring power test, such as X-Score(HM), ChemScore@SYBYL, ChemPLP@GOLD, and PLP@DS, are also top-ranked in the ranking power test. Top-ranked scoring functions in the docking power test, such as ChemPLP@GOLD, Chemscore@GOLD, GlidScore-SP, LigScore@DS, and PLP@DS, are also top-ranked in the screening power test. Our results obtained on the entire test set and its subsets suggest that the real challenge in protein-ligand binding affinity prediction lies in polar interactions and associated desolvation effect. Nonadditive features observed among high-affinity protein-ligand complexes also need attention. |
| 学科主题 | 计算机化学 |
| 收录类别 | SCI |
| 原文出处 | http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ci500081m |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 源URL | [http://ir.sioc.ac.cn/handle/331003/38925]  |
| 专题 | 上海有机化学研究所_计算机化学与化学信息学研究室 |
| 作者单位 | 1.中科院上海有机化学研究所 2.澳门科技大学 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | LI YAN,HAN LI,LIU ZHIHAI,et al. Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions on an Updated Benchmark: 2. Evaluation Methods and General Results[J]. J. Chem Inf. Model.,2014,54(6):1717-1736. |
| APA | LI YAN,HAN LI,LIU ZHIHAI,&王任小.(2014).Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions on an Updated Benchmark: 2. Evaluation Methods and General Results.J. Chem Inf. Model.,54(6),1717-1736. |
| MLA | LI YAN,et al."Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions on an Updated Benchmark: 2. Evaluation Methods and General Results".J. Chem Inf. Model. 54.6(2014):1717-1736. |
入库方式： OAI收割
来源：上海有机化学研究所
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。