中国科学院机构知识库网格
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid
Strain gradient plasticity analysis of elasto-plastic contact between rough surfaces

文献类型:期刊论文

作者Song H; Van der Giessen, E; Liu X
刊名JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICS AND PHYSICS OF SOLIDS
出版日期2016
卷号96页码:18-28
通讯作者邮箱E.van.der.Giessen@rug.nl ; xiaomingliu@lnm.imech.ac.cn
关键词Rough surface Contact Strain gradient plasticity Pressure distribution
ISSN号0022-5096
产权排序[Song, H.; Van der Giessen, E.] Univ Groningen, Zernike Inst Adv Mat, NL-9747 AG Groningen, Netherlands; [Liu, X.] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Mech, State Key Lab Nonlinear Mech, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
通讯作者Van der Giessen, E (reprint author), Univ Groningen, Zernike Inst Adv Mat, NL-9747 AG Groningen, Netherlands. ; Liu, X (reprint author), Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Mech, State Key Lab Nonlinear Mech, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China.
中文摘要From a microscopic point of view, the real contact area between two rough surfaces is the sum of the areas of contact between facing asperities. Since the real contact area is a fraction of the nominal contact area, the real contact pressure is much higher than the nominal contact pressure, which results in plastic deformation of asperities. As plasticity is size dependent at size scales below tens of micrometers, with the general trend of smaller being harder, macroscopic plasticity is not suitable to describe plastic deformation of small asperities and thus fails to capture the real contact area and pressure accurately. Here we adopt conventional mechanism-based strain gradient plasticity (CMSGP) to analyze the contact between a rigid platen and an elasto-plastic solid with a rough surface. Flattening of a single sinusoidal asperity is analyzed first to highlight the difference between CMSGP and J(2) isotropic plasticity. For the rough surface contact, besides CMSGP, pure elastic and J(2) isotropic plasticity analysis is also carried out for comparison. In all cases, the contact area A rises linearly with the applied load, but with a different slope which implies that the mean contact pressures are different. CMSGP produces qualitative changes in the distributions of local contact pressures compared with pure elastic and J(2) isotropic plasticity analysis, furthermore, bounded by the two. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
分类号一类
类目[WOS]Materials Science, Multidisciplinary ; Mechanics ; Physics, Condensed Matter
研究领域[WOS]Materials Science ; Mechanics ; Physics
关键词[WOS]Rough surface ; Contact ; Strain gradient plasticity ; Pressure distribution
收录类别SCI ; EI
原文出处http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2016.07.008
语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000386744600002
源URL[http://dspace.imech.ac.cn/handle/311007/59941]  
专题力学研究所_非线性力学国家重点实验室
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Song H,Van der Giessen, E,Liu X. Strain gradient plasticity analysis of elasto-plastic contact between rough surfaces[J]. JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICS AND PHYSICS OF SOLIDS,2016,96:18-28.
APA Song H,Van der Giessen, E,&Liu X.(2016).Strain gradient plasticity analysis of elasto-plastic contact between rough surfaces.JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICS AND PHYSICS OF SOLIDS,96,18-28.
MLA Song H,et al."Strain gradient plasticity analysis of elasto-plastic contact between rough surfaces".JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICS AND PHYSICS OF SOLIDS 96(2016):18-28.

入库方式: OAI收割

来源:力学研究所

浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。