目的了解志愿者群体共情与抑郁情绪之间的关系及公正敏感性在其中的调节作用。方法于2015年10月-2016年1月采用随机抽样方法抽取中国509名志愿者,使用共情量表(IRI) 、流调中心抑郁量表(CES-D) 、公正敏感性量表(JSI)进行问卷调查。结果志愿者抑郁情绪为(11.52 ± 7.73)分,幻想为(11.56 ± 5.10)分,共情关注为(14.45 ± 4.23)分,观点采择为(14.71 ± 4.44)分,个体忧伤为(10.71 ± 4.68)分,旁观者公正敏感性为(26.85 ± 10.55)分;共情关注、观点采择维度对抑郁情绪均有负向预测作用(β = - 0.25、- 0.23,均P < 0.01),个体忧伤维度则对抑郁有正向预测作用(β = 0.23,P < 0.01),旁观者公正敏感性也对抑郁有正向预测作用(β = 0.16, P < 0.01);旁观者公正敏感性能够减缓个体低幻想对抑郁情绪的负性影响(β = - 0.11,P < 0.05) 。结论志愿者的旁观者公正敏感性在共情与抑郁情绪之间起调节作用。

Objective To examine the relationship between empathy and depression and to explore moderation effect of justice sensitivity on the relationship among volunteers. Methods Totally 509 volunteers were recruited with random sampling from 23 provinces,municipalities and autonomous regions across China and surveyed with Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI),Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), and Justice Sensitivity Inventory (JSI) between October 2015 and January 2016. Results For all the volunteers, the average scores were 11.52 ± 7.73 for depression, 11.56 ± 5.10 for fantasy,14.45 ± 4.23 for empathy concern,14.71 ± 4.44 for perspective taking,10.71 ± 4.68 for personal distress, and 26.85 ± 10.55 for observer justice sensitivity, respectively. Empathy concern and perspective taking had a negative predictability to depression (β = - 0.25 and - 0.23,both P < 0.01); personal distress had a positive predictability to depression (β = 0.23,P < 0.01); observer justice sensitivity also had a positive predictability to depression (β = 0.16,P < 0.01). Observer justice sensitivity could alleviate the negative impact of low fantasy on depression (β = - 0.11,P < 0.05). Conclusion Observer justice sensitivity plays a regulative role on the relationship between empathy and depression among volunteers in China.