目的:修订中文版积极/消极注意偏向量表(The attention to Positive and Negative Information Scale, APNI),并检验其在地震后初中生人群的信效度。方法:用中文版APNI量表、积极/消极情绪量表(Positive Affectand Negative Affect Scale, PANAS)、儿童事件冲击量表(Children’s Revised ImpactofEventScale, CRIES)、创伤后成长量表——儿童修订版(Children’s Revised Positive-traumatic Growth Inventory, PTGI-C)对云南鲁甸地震灾区1199名初中生进行测试。结果:探索性因素分析得出两因素模型,删除载荷小于0.4的11个条目,解释总变异的42.9%。验证性因素分析验证了探索性因素分析的因子结构,拟合度较好(χ~2/df=2.76,CFI=0.95,NFI=0.93,TLI=0.94,GFI=0.95,RMSEA=0.05);所有项目的决断值均显著(P<0.001),各条目与量表总分相关在0.36~0.66之间。APNI量表总分和积极的注意偏向、消极的注意偏向的Cronbach’s α系数依次为0.92、0.92、0.83。积极的注意偏向与积极情绪(r=0.51,P<0.01)、 PTG(r=0.52,P<0.01)呈现显著正相关;消极的注意偏向与消极情绪(r=0.46,P<0.01)、PTSD(r=0.42,P<0.01)呈现显著正相关。结论:修订后的中文版APNI量表在地震受灾的初中生群体中具有良好信效度,适合在中国背景下使用。

Objective: To revise the Attention to Positive and Negative Information Scale(APNI) in Chinese subjects after the earthquake. Methods: Take the Chinese version of the Children’s Revised Impact of Event Scale(CRIES), the Revised Posttraumatic Growth Inventory for Children(PTG-C), the Positive and Negative Affect Scale(PANAS) to make a survey among 1199 middle-school students from Ludian quake affected area. Results: According to the results of exploratory factor analysis,we deleted ten entry of the primary model and it was confirmed in the confirmatory analysis. The fit indices were χ~2/df =2.76, CFI=0.95, NFI=0.93, TLI=0.94, GFI=0.95, RMSEA=0.05. The critical ratios of all the items were significant(P <0.001), and the correlations between each item and the total score ranged from 0.36 to 0.66. The Cronbach’s α of the total scale, positive attentional bias and negative attentional bias subscale were 0.92, 0.92, 0.83 respectively. Positive attentional bias showed a significant positive correlation with positive affect(r =0.51,P <0.01) and PTG(r =0.52,P <0.01), and negative attentional bias showed a significant positive correlation with negative affect(r =0.46,P <0.01) and PTSD(r =0.42,P < 0.01). Conclusion: The Chinese Revision of Attention to Positive and Negative Information Scale has good reliability and validity, hence they are suitable for measurement in Chinese.