Holistic thinking and air traffic controllers' decision making in conflict resolution
文献类型：期刊论文
| 作者 | E Xiaotian1,2 ; Zhang Jingyu1
|
| 刊名 | TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR
 |
| 出版日期 | 2017-02-01 |
| 卷号 | 45页码:110-121 |
| 关键词 | Air traffic control Conflict resolution Holistic thinking style Decision making Workload management |
| ISSN号 | 1369-8478 |
| 英文摘要 | When facing potential conflicts, whether to make interventions is an important decision for air traffic controllers and vital for aviation safety and efficiency. While many task-related factors in influencing such decisions have been identified, the large portion of individual differences has remained insufficiently explained. This paper proposes that controllers with a more holistic thinking style will be more likely to make interventions because they envision more uncertainties in the system which can lead to a higher level of perceived risk and a greater likelihood to take proactive measures. To test these hypotheses, forty-two licensed controllers were invited to complete a questionnaire measuring holistic thinking style and later a conflict detection/resolution task. Multilevel regression analyses showed that (1) when the real risk level (the minimum lateral distance between two converging aircraft) dropped, controllers who think more holistically still tended to maintain a higher risk perception level (perceived likelihood of aircraft collision in the future) which lead to a higher intervention ratio and (2) even when real and perceived risk levels were controlled, those who think more holistically were more likely to make interventions. These findings are discussed with reference to literature in cognitive style, risk perception and workload management. Potential implications for personnel selection and training are also discussed. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
| WOS标题词 | Social Sciences ; Science & Technology ; Technology |
| 类目[WOS] | Psychology, Applied ; Transportation |
| 研究领域[WOS] | Psychology ; Transportation |
| 关键词[WOS] | INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES ; CULTURE ; PERCEPTION ; TASK ; WORKLOAD ; MODEL |
| 收录类别 | SSCI |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| WOS记录号 | WOS:000394563200010 |
| 源URL | [http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/21320]  |
| 专题 | 心理研究所_中国科学院行为科学重点实验室 |
| 作者单位 | 1.Inst Psychol, CAS Key Lab Behav Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China 2.Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | E Xiaotian,Zhang Jingyu. Holistic thinking and air traffic controllers' decision making in conflict resolution[J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR,2017,45:110-121. |
| APA | E Xiaotian,&Zhang Jingyu.(2017).Holistic thinking and air traffic controllers' decision making in conflict resolution.TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR,45,110-121. |
| MLA | E Xiaotian,et al."Holistic thinking and air traffic controllers' decision making in conflict resolution".TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR 45(2017):110-121. |
入库方式： OAI收割
来源：心理研究所
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。