中国科学院机构知识库网格
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid
Numerical comparison of two modes of gas-solid riser operation: Fluid catalytic cracking vs CFB combustor

文献类型:期刊论文

作者Mei, Yifeng1,4; Zhao, Mingzhao1,2; Lu, Bona1; Chen, Sheng3; Wang, Wei1,4
刊名PARTICUOLOGY
出版日期2017-04-01
卷号31页码:42-48
关键词Fluidization Computational fluid dynamics Simulation Fluid catalytic cracking Circulating fluidized bed Choking
ISSN号1674-2001
英文摘要Two modes of gas-solid riser operation, i.e., fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) and circulating fluidized bed combustor (CFBC), have been recognized in literature; particularly in the understanding of choking phenomena. This work compares these two modes of operation through computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation. In CFD simulations, the different operations are represented by fixing appropriate boundary conditions: solids flux or solids inventory. It is found that the FCC and CFBC modes generally have the same dependence of solids flux on the mean solids volume fraction or solids inventory. However, during the choking transition, the FCC mode of operation needs more time to reach a steady state; thus the FCC system may have insufficient time to respond to valve adjustments or flow state change, leading to the choking. The difference between FCC and CFBC systems is more pronounced for the systems with longer risers. A more detailed investigation of these two modes of riser operation may require a three-dimensional full loop simulation with dynamic valve adjustment. (C) 2016 Chinese Society of Particuology and Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
WOS标题词Science & Technology ; Technology
类目[WOS]Engineering, Chemical ; Materials Science, Multidisciplinary
研究领域[WOS]Engineering ; Materials Science
关键词[WOS]MULTISCALE CFD ; FAST FLUIDIZATION ; BED BOILER ; FULL-LOOP ; FLOW ; SIMULATION ; CHOKING ; HYDRODYNAMICS ; SUSPENSIONS ; PARTICLES
收录类别SCI
语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000397695500006
源URL[http://ir.ipe.ac.cn/handle/122111/22149]  
专题过程工程研究所_多相复杂系统国家重点实验室
作者单位1.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Proc Engn, State Key Lab Multiphase Complex Syst, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
2.Sichuan Univ, Sch Chem Engn, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China
3.China Univ Petr, State Key Lab Heavy Oil Proc, Beijing 102249, Peoples R China
4.Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Mei, Yifeng,Zhao, Mingzhao,Lu, Bona,et al. Numerical comparison of two modes of gas-solid riser operation: Fluid catalytic cracking vs CFB combustor[J]. PARTICUOLOGY,2017,31:42-48.
APA Mei, Yifeng,Zhao, Mingzhao,Lu, Bona,Chen, Sheng,&Wang, Wei.(2017).Numerical comparison of two modes of gas-solid riser operation: Fluid catalytic cracking vs CFB combustor.PARTICUOLOGY,31,42-48.
MLA Mei, Yifeng,et al."Numerical comparison of two modes of gas-solid riser operation: Fluid catalytic cracking vs CFB combustor".PARTICUOLOGY 31(2017):42-48.

入库方式: OAI收割

来源:过程工程研究所

浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。