Chinese subject-relative clauses are more difficult to process than the object-relative clauses
文献类型:期刊论文
作者 | Chen, Baoguo1; Ning, Aihua1; Bi, Hongyan2![]() |
刊名 | ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA
![]() |
出版日期 | 2008-09-01 |
卷号 | 129期号:1页码:61-65 |
关键词 | subject-relative clause object-relative clause working memory Chinese |
ISSN号 | 0001-6918 |
文献子类 | Article |
英文摘要 | This paper presents an experiment that compared high and low working memory span readers' abilities to process Chinese subject-relative and object-relative clause structures in a self-paced reading paradigm. Comprehension performance results indicated that the object-relative structure was easier to understand than the subject-relative structure. Reading time results showed that participants with low working memory span read the subject-relative structures more slowly than the object-relative structures, but there was no reading time difference for the high working memory span participants. The experiment provides further evidence that the Chinese subject-relative clause structure is more difficult to process than the Chinese object-relative clause structure. especially for low working memory span individuals. Furthermore, these results support a syntactic storage account of the observed complexity difference.; This paper presents an experiment that compared high and low working memory span readers' abilities to process Chinese subject-relative and object-relative clause structures in a self-paced reading paradigm. Comprehension performance results indicated that the object-relative structure was easier to understand than the subject-relative structure. Reading time results showed that participants with low working memory span read the subject-relative structures more slowly than the object-relative structures, but there was no reading time difference for the high working memory span participants. The experiment provides further evidence that the Chinese subject-relative clause structure is more difficult to process than the Chinese object-relative clause structure. especially for low working memory span individuals. Furthermore, these results support a syntactic storage account of the observed complexity difference. (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier B.V. |
学科主题 | 心理语言学 |
语种 | 英语 |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000259615800007 |
公开日期 | 2011-08-22 |
源URL | [http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/5253] ![]() |
专题 | 心理研究所_中国科学院心理研究所回溯数据库(1956-2010) |
通讯作者 | B. G. Chen |
作者单位 | 1.Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, Beijing Key Lab Appl Expt Psychol, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China 2.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China 3.Univ Pittsburgh, Ctr Learning Res & Dev, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Chen, Baoguo,Ning, Aihua,Bi, Hongyan,et al. Chinese subject-relative clauses are more difficult to process than the object-relative clauses[J]. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA,2008,129(1):61-65. |
APA | Chen, Baoguo,Ning, Aihua,Bi, Hongyan,Dunlap, Susan,&B. G. Chen.(2008).Chinese subject-relative clauses are more difficult to process than the object-relative clauses.ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA,129(1),61-65. |
MLA | Chen, Baoguo,et al."Chinese subject-relative clauses are more difficult to process than the object-relative clauses".ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA 129.1(2008):61-65. |
入库方式: OAI收割
来源:心理研究所
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。