热门
Self-reported versus clinician-rated symptoms of depression as outcome measures in psychotherapy research on depression: A meta-analysis
文献类型：期刊论文
| 作者 | Cuijpers, Pim1,2; Li, Juan3 ; Hofmann, Stefan G.4; Andersson, Gerhard5,6; Pim Cuijpers
|
| 刊名 | CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW
 |
| 出版日期 | 2010-08-01 |
| 卷号 | 30期号:6页码:768-778 |
| 关键词 | Depression Major depression Meta-analysis Self-report Clinician-rated |
| ISSN号 | 0272-7358 |
| 文献子类 | Review |
| 英文摘要 | It is not well-known whether self-report measures and clinician-rated instruments for depression result in comparable outcomes in research on psychotherapy. We conducted a meta-analysis in which randomized controlled trials were included examining the effects of psychotherapy for adult depression. Only studies were included in which both a self-report and a clinician-rated instrument were used. We calculated the effect size (Hedges' g) based on the self-report measures, the effect size based on the clinician-rated instruments, and the difference between these two effect sizes (Delta g). A total of 48 studies including a total of 2462 participants was included in the meta-analysis. The differential effect size was Delta g=0.20 (95% CI: 0.10-0.30), indicating that clinician-rated instruments resulted in a significantly higher effect size than self-report instruments from the same studies. When we limited the effect size analysis to those studies comparing the HRSD with the BDI, the differential effect was somewhat smaller, but still statistically significant (Delta g=0.15; 95% CI: 0.03-0.27). This meta-analysis has made it clear that clinician-rated and self-report measures of improvement following psychotherapy for depression are not equivalent. Different symptoms may be more suitable for self-report or ratings by clinicians and in clinical trials it is probably best to include both. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
| 学科主题 | 医学心理学 |
| 资助项目 | 一室李娟课题组 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| WOS记录号 | WOS:000280573600013 |
| 公开日期 | 2011-11-14 |
| 源URL | [http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/7015]  |
| 专题 | 心理研究所_中国科学院心理研究所回溯数据库(1956-2010) |
| 通讯作者 | Pim Cuijpers |
| 作者单位 | 1.Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Clin Psychol, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands 2.Vrije Univ Amsterdam, EMGO Inst Hlth & Care Res, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands 3.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, Key Lab Mental Hlth, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China 4.Boston Univ, Dept Psychol, Boston, MA 02215 USA 5.Linkoping Univ, Swedish Inst Disabil Res, Dept Behav Sci & Learning, S-58183 Linkoping, Sweden 6.Karolinska Inst, Psychiat Sect, Dept Clin Neurosci, Stockholm, Sweden |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Cuijpers, Pim,Li, Juan,Hofmann, Stefan G.,et al. Self-reported versus clinician-rated symptoms of depression as outcome measures in psychotherapy research on depression: A meta-analysis[J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW,2010,30(6):768-778. |
| APA | Cuijpers, Pim,Li, Juan,Hofmann, Stefan G.,Andersson, Gerhard,&Pim Cuijpers.(2010).Self-reported versus clinician-rated symptoms of depression as outcome measures in psychotherapy research on depression: A meta-analysis.CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW,30(6),768-778. |
| MLA | Cuijpers, Pim,et al."Self-reported versus clinician-rated symptoms of depression as outcome measures in psychotherapy research on depression: A meta-analysis".CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW 30.6(2010):768-778. |
入库方式： OAI收割
来源：心理研究所
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。