中国科学院机构知识库网格
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid
首页 机构 成果 学者
  
  1. CAS IR Grid
  2. 地质与地球物理研究所
  3. 中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所
  4. 中国科学院地球与行星物理重点实验室
Comparison of the ionospheric F-2 peak height between ionosonde measurements and IRI2016 predictions over China

文献类型：期刊论文

作者Zhao, Xiukuan1; Ning, Baiqi1; Zhang, Man-Lian1; Hu, Lianhuan1
刊名ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH
出版日期2017-10-01
卷号60期号:7页码:1524-1531
关键词IRI2016 Ionosonde hmF2 Empirical ionospheric model
ISSN号0273-1177
DOI10.1016/j.asr.2017.06.056
文献子类Article
英文摘要The International Reference Ionosphere (IRI) is the most frequently used community empirical model. The latest version IRI2016 provides three options for the F2 peak height hmF2: AMTB2013, SHU-2015, and BSE-1979. In this paper, we used the hmF2 data derived by the ionosondes at Mohe, Beijing, Wuhan and Sanya ranging from year 2007 to 2016 to assess the performance of these three options in the model. The results show that the variability of the observed hmF2 versus local time, seasons and levels of solar activity could be reproduced well by the three options. However, the SHU-2015 option performs best at these four stations, followed by BSE-1979, and the AMTB2013 option is worst. Generally, the AMTB2013 and BSE-1979 options overestimate the hmF2 values, while the SHU-2015 option mainly underestimates the hmF2 values. This is the first evaluations of the three IRI2016 hmF2 options by manually scaled ionosonde data over China area to our knowledge. Overall, we recommend the usage of SHU-2015 hmF2 option over China region when using IRI2016 model in terms of hmF2 calculation. (C) 2017 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
WOS关键词RADIO-OCCULTATION ; GLOBAL-MODEL ; WINDS ; PARAMETERS ; HMF2
WOS研究方向Astronomy & Astrophysics ; Geology ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000410012800014
出版者ELSEVIER SCI LTD
资助机构National Natural Science Foundation of China(41374164 ; National Natural Science Foundation of China(41374164 ; CAS Key Technology Talent Program ; CAS Key Technology Talent Program ; 41574149 ; 41574149 ; 41104106) ; 41104106) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China(41374164 ; National Natural Science Foundation of China(41374164 ; CAS Key Technology Talent Program ; CAS Key Technology Talent Program ; 41574149 ; 41574149 ; 41104106) ; 41104106) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China(41374164 ; National Natural Science Foundation of China(41374164 ; CAS Key Technology Talent Program ; CAS Key Technology Talent Program ; 41574149 ; 41574149 ; 41104106) ; 41104106) ; National Natural Science Foundation of China(41374164 ; National Natural Science Foundation of China(41374164 ; CAS Key Technology Talent Program ; CAS Key Technology Talent Program ; 41574149 ; 41574149 ; 41104106) ; 41104106)
源URL[http://ir.iggcas.ac.cn/handle/132A11/61904]  
专题地质与地球物理研究所_中国科学院地球与行星物理重点实验室
通讯作者Zhao, Xiukuan
作者单位1.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geol & Geophys, Key Lab Earth & Planetary Phys, 19 Beitucheng Western Rd, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
2.Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing Natl Observ Space Environm, Inst Geol & Geophys, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714		 Zhao, Xiukuan,Ning, Baiqi,Zhang, Man-Lian,et al. Comparison of the ionospheric F-2 peak height between ionosonde measurements and IRI2016 predictions over China[J]. ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH,2017,60(7):1524-1531.
APA Zhao, Xiukuan,Ning, Baiqi,Zhang, Man-Lian,&Hu, Lianhuan.(2017).Comparison of the ionospheric F-2 peak height between ionosonde measurements and IRI2016 predictions over China.ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH,60(7),1524-1531.
MLA Zhao, Xiukuan,et al."Comparison of the ionospheric F-2 peak height between ionosonde measurements and IRI2016 predictions over China".ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH 60.7(2017):1524-1531.

入库方式： OAI收割

来源：地质与地球物理研究所

浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本

除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。