Emergy assessment of three home courtyard agriculture production systems in Tibet Autonomous Region, China
文献类型：期刊论文
| 作者 | Guan, FC; Wang, C (Wang, Chao)2; Wang, JF (Wang, Jun-feng)2; Zhang, YY (Zhang, Yu-yang)2; Sha, ZP (Sha, Zhi-peng)2; Guan, FC (Guan, Fa-chun)1,2 |
| 刊名 | JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE B
 |
| 出版日期 | 2016 |
| 卷号 | 17期号:8页码:628-639 |
| 关键词 | Economic-evaluation Integrated Emergy Northwest China Rural Household Sustainability Biogas Energy County Farms Water |
| DOI | 10.1631/jzus.B1500154 |
| 文献子类 | Article |
| 英文摘要 | Home courtyard agriculture is an important model of agricultural production on the Tibetan plateau. Because of the sensitive and fragile plateau environment, it needs to have optimal performance characteristics, including high sustainability, low environmental pressure, and high economic benefit. Emergy analysis is a promising tool for evaluation of the environmental-economic performance of these production systems. In this study, emergy analysis was used to evaluate three courtyard agricultural production models: Raising Geese in Corn Fields (RGICF), Conventional Corn Planting (CCP), and Pea-Wheat Rotation (PWR). The results showed that the RGICF model produced greater economic benefits, and had higher sustainability, lower environmental pressure, and higher product safety than the CCP and PWR models. The emergy yield ratio (EYR) and emergy self-support ratio (ESR) of RGICF were 0.66 and 0.11, respectively, lower than those of the CCP production model, and 0.99 and 0.08, respectively, lower than those of the PWR production model. The impact of RGICF (1.45) on the environment was lower than that of CCP (2.26) and PWR (2.46). The emergy sustainable indices (ESIs) of RGICF were 1.07 and 1.02 times higher than those of CCP and PWR, respectively. With regard to the emergy index of product safety (EIPS), RGICF had a higher safety index than those of CCP and PWR. Overall, our results suggest that the RGICF model is advantageous and provides higher environmental benefits than the CCP and PWR systems. |
| 学科主题 | 自然地理学 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| WOS记录号 | WOS:000381455000007 |
| 源URL | [http://ir.itpcas.ac.cn/handle/131C11/7645]  |
| 专题 | 青藏高原研究所_图书馆 |
| 通讯作者 | Guan, FC |
| 作者单位 | 1.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Tibetan Plateau Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China 2.Tibet Univ, Agr & Anim Husb Coll, Nyingchi 860000, Peoples R China |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Guan, FC,Wang, C ,Wang, JF ,et al. Emergy assessment of three home courtyard agriculture production systems in Tibet Autonomous Region, China[J]. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE B,2016,17(8):628-639. |
| APA | Guan, FC,Wang, C ,Wang, JF ,Zhang, YY ,Sha, ZP ,&Guan, FC .(2016).Emergy assessment of three home courtyard agriculture production systems in Tibet Autonomous Region, China.JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE B,17(8),628-639. |
| MLA | Guan, FC,et al."Emergy assessment of three home courtyard agriculture production systems in Tibet Autonomous Region, China".JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE B 17.8(2016):628-639. |
入库方式： OAI收割
来源：青藏高原研究所
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。