中国科学院机构知识库网格
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid
Methodological comparison of alpine meadow evapotranspiration on the Tibetan Plateau, China

文献类型:期刊论文

作者Chang, Yaping1,2; Wang, Jie3; Qin, Dahe1; Ding, Yongjian1,2,4; Zhao, Qiudong1,4; Liu, Fengjing5; Zhang, Shigiang6,7
刊名PLOS ONE
出版日期2017-12-13
卷号12期号:12页码:20
ISSN号1932-6203
DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0189059
通讯作者Ding, Yongjian(dyj@lzb.ac.cn) ; Zhang, Shigiang(zhangsq@lzb.ac.cn)
英文摘要Estimation of evapotranspiration (ET) for alpine meadow areas in the Tibetan Plateau (TP) is essential for water resource management. However, observation data has been limited due to the extreme climates and complex terrain of this region. To address these issues, four representative methods, Penman-Monteith (PM), Priestley-Taylor (PT), Hargreaves-Samani (HS), and Mahringer (MG) methods, were adopted to estimate ET, which were then compared with ET measured using Eddy Covariance (EC) for five alpine meadow sites during the growing seasons from 2010 to 2014. And each site was measured for one growing season during this period. The results demonstrate that the PT method outperformed at all sites with a coefficient of determination (R-2) ranging from 0.76 to 0.94 and root mean square error (RMSE) ranging from 0.41 to 0.62 mm d(-1). The PM method showed better performance than HS and MG methods, and the HS method produced relatively acceptable results with higher R-2 (0.46) and lower RMSE (0.89 mm d(-1)) compared to MG method with R-2 of 0.16 and RMSE of 1.62 mm d(-1), while MG underestimated ET at all alpine meadow sites. Therefore, the PT method, being the simpler approach and less data dependent, is recommended to estimate ET for alpine meadow areas in the Tibetan Plateau. The PM method produced reliable results when available data were sufficient, and the HS method proved to be a complementary method when variables were insufficient. On the contrary, the MG method always underestimated ET and is, thus, not suitable for alpine meadows. These results provide a basis for estimating ET on the Tibetan Plateau for annual data collection, analysis, and future studies.
收录类别SCI
WOS关键词ENERGY-BALANCE CLOSURE ; LAKE SELIN CO ; EDDY-COVARIANCE ; CROP-COEFFICIENTS ; SEMIARID CLIMATE ; WATER-VAPOR ; HEAT-FLUX ; GRASSLAND ; MODEL ; EXCHANGE
WOS研究方向Science & Technology - Other Topics
WOS类目Multidisciplinary Sciences
语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000417884100038
出版者PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
URI标识http://www.irgrid.ac.cn/handle/1471x/2558048
专题寒区旱区环境与工程研究所
通讯作者Ding, Yongjian; Zhang, Shigiang
作者单位1.Chinese Acad Sci, Northwest Inst Ecoenvironm & Resources, State Key Lab Cryospher Sci, Lanzhou, Gansu, Peoples R China
2.Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
3.Hohai Univ, State Key Lab Hydrol Water Res & Hydraul Engn, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
4.Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Ecohydrol Inland River Basin, Lanzhou, Gansu, Peoples R China
5.Michigan Technol Univ, Sch Forest Resources & Environm Sci, Houghton, MI 49931 USA
6.Northwest Univ, Shaanxi Key Lab Earth Surface Syst & Environm Car, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
7.Northwest Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Chang, Yaping,Wang, Jie,Qin, Dahe,et al. Methodological comparison of alpine meadow evapotranspiration on the Tibetan Plateau, China[J]. PLOS ONE,2017,12(12):20.
APA Chang, Yaping.,Wang, Jie.,Qin, Dahe.,Ding, Yongjian.,Zhao, Qiudong.,...&Zhang, Shigiang.(2017).Methodological comparison of alpine meadow evapotranspiration on the Tibetan Plateau, China.PLOS ONE,12(12),20.
MLA Chang, Yaping,et al."Methodological comparison of alpine meadow evapotranspiration on the Tibetan Plateau, China".PLOS ONE 12.12(2017):20.

入库方式: iSwitch采集

来源:寒区旱区环境与工程研究所

浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。