中国科学院机构知识库网格
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid
Comparative evaluation of label-free quantification strategies

文献类型:期刊论文

作者Zhao, Lei2; Cong, Xiaoji1,3; Zhai, Linhui1; Hu, Hao1; Xu, Jun-Yu1; Zhao, Wensi1,3; Zhu, Mengdi1,3; Tan, Minjia1,3; Ye, Bang-Ce2
刊名JOURNAL OF PROTEOMICS
出版日期2020-03-20
卷号215页码:8
ISSN号1874-3919
关键词Label-free quantification Proteomics Precision Accuracy
DOI10.1016/j.jprot.2020.103669
通讯作者Tan, Minjia(mjtan@simm.ac.cn) ; Ye, Bang-Ce(bcye@ecust.edu.cn)
英文摘要The selection of a data processing method for use in mass spectrometry-based label-free proteome quantification contributes significantly to its accuracy and precision. In this study, we comprehensively evaluated 7 commonly-used label-free quantification methods (MaxQuant-Spectrum count, MaxQuant-iBAQ, MaxQuant-LFQ, MaxQuant-LFAQ, Proteome Discoverer, MetaMorpheus, TPP-StPeter) with a focus on missing values, precision, accuracy, selectivity, and reproducibility of low abundance protein quantification in both single shot and fractionation. Our results showed that among the tested strategies, MaxQuant in MaxLFQ mode outperformed other strategies in terms of accuracy and precision in both whole proteome and low abundance proteome quantification, whereas the Proteome Discoverer (PD) strategy using SEQUEST as a search engine performed better in terms of quantifiable low abundance proteome coverage. We subsequently applied the PD and MaxLFQ strategies in a blood proteomic dataset and found that many FDA-approved tumor prognostic biomarkers could be identified as well as quantified using the PD strategy, indicating the potential advantage of PD in label-free quantification studies. These results provide a reference for method choice in label-free quantification data analysis. Significance: Mass spectrometry-based label-free quantification methods play an important role in label-free proteome data analysis. In this study, we evaluated 7 commonly-used label-free quantification methods with respect to the following aspects: missing values, precision, accuracy, selectivity, and reproducibility for low abundance protein quantification. The results showed that, among the strategies evaluated, the PD strategy with SEQUEST as a search engine performed better in terms of low abundance protein coverage. This study provides a reference for method choice in label-free quantification data analysis.
WOS关键词POLYMERIC IMMUNOGLOBULIN RECEPTOR ; COMPLEX PROTEIN MIXTURES ; MASS-SPECTROMETRY ; PLASMA PROTEOME
资助项目Special Project on Precision Medicine under the National Key RD Program[2017YFC0906600] ; National Natural Science Foundation of China[31730004] ; National Natural Science Foundation of China[21575089] ; National Natural Science Foundation of China[31670066] ; National Natural Science Foundation of China[91753203] ; Natural Science Foundation of China for Innovation Research Group[81821005]
WOS研究方向Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
语种英语
出版者ELSEVIER
WOS记录号WOS:000519667800012
源URL[http://119.78.100.183/handle/2S10ELR8/281120]  
专题新药研究国家重点实验室
通讯作者Tan, Minjia; Ye, Bang-Ce
作者单位1.Chinese Acad Sci, Chem Prote Ctr, Shanghai Inst Mat Med, State Key Lab Drug Res, Shanghai, Peoples R China
2.East China Univ Sci & Technol, Lab Biosyst & Microanal, State Key Lab Bioreactor Engn, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
3.Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Zhao, Lei,Cong, Xiaoji,Zhai, Linhui,et al. Comparative evaluation of label-free quantification strategies[J]. JOURNAL OF PROTEOMICS,2020,215:8.
APA Zhao, Lei.,Cong, Xiaoji.,Zhai, Linhui.,Hu, Hao.,Xu, Jun-Yu.,...&Ye, Bang-Ce.(2020).Comparative evaluation of label-free quantification strategies.JOURNAL OF PROTEOMICS,215,8.
MLA Zhao, Lei,et al."Comparative evaluation of label-free quantification strategies".JOURNAL OF PROTEOMICS 215(2020):8.

入库方式: OAI收割

来源:上海药物研究所

浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。