Evaluating different methods for elevation calibration of MAX-DOAS (Multi AXis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy) instruments during the CINDI-2 campaign
文献类型：期刊论文
| 作者 | Donner, Sebastian7; Kuhn, Jonas7,8; Van Roozendael, Michel9; Bais, Alkiviadis10; Beirle, Steffen7; Boesch, Tim11; Bognar, Kristof12; Bruchkouski, Ilya13; Chan, Ka Lok14; Doerner, Steffen7 |
| 刊名 | ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES
 |
| 出版日期 | 2020-02-13 |
| 卷号 | 13 |
| ISSN号 | 1867-1381 |
| DOI | 10.5194/amt-13-685-2020 |
| 通讯作者 | Donner, Sebastian(sebastian.donner@mpic.de) |
| 英文摘要 | We present different methods for in-field elevation calibration of MAX-DOAS (Multi AXis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy) instruments that were applied and inter-compared during the second Cabauw Intercomparison campaign for Nitrogen Dioxide measuring Instruments (CINDI-2). One necessary prerequisite of consistent MAX-DOAS retrievals is a precise and accurate calibration of the elevation angles of the different measuring systems. Therefore, different methods for this calibration were applied to several instruments during the campaign, and the results were inter-compared. This work first introduces and explains the different methods, namely far- and near-lamp measurements, white-stripe scans, horizon scans and sun scans, using data and results for only one (mainly the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry) instrument. In the second part, the far-lamp measurements and the horizon scans are examined for all participating groups. Here, the results for both methods are first inter-compared for the different instruments; secondly, the two methods are compared amongst each other. All methods turned out to be well-suited for the calibration of the elevation angles of MAX-DOAS systems, with each of them having individual advantages and drawbacks. Considering the results of this study, the systematic uncertainties of the methods can be estimated as +/- 0.05 degrees for the far-lamp measurements and the sun scans, +/- 0.25 degrees for the horizon scans, and around +/- 0.1 degrees for the white-stripe and near-lamp measurements. When comparing the results of far-lamp and horizon-scan measurements, a spread of around 0.9 degrees in the elevation calibrations is found between the participating instruments for both methods. This spread is of the order of a typical field of view (FOV) of a MAX-DOAS instrument and therefore affecting the retrieval results. Further, consistent (wavelength dependent) offsets of 0.32 degrees and 0.40 degrees between far-lamp measurements and horizon scans are found, which can be explained by the fact that, despite the flat topography around the measurement site, obstacles such as trees might mark the visible horizon during daytime. The observed wavelength dependence can be explained by surface albedo effects. Lastly, the results are discussed and recommendations for future campaigns are given. |
| WOS关键词 | SLANT COLUMN MEASUREMENTS ; ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOLS ; DERIVE INFORMATION ; NITROGEN-DIOXIDE ; PROFILES ; NO2 ; FORMALDEHYDE ; EXTINCTION ; RETRIEVAL ; AIR |
| 资助项目 | ESA through the CINDI-2[4000118533/16/I-Sbo] ; ESA through the FRM4DOAS[4000118181/16/IEF] ; EU 7 Framework Programme QA4ECV[607405] ; Austrian Science Fund (FWF)[I 2296-N29] ; Canadian Space Agency (AVATARS project) ; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (PAHA project) ; Canada Foundation for Innovation |
| WOS研究方向 | Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| WOS记录号 | WOS:000514150700001 |
| 出版者 | COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH |
| 资助机构 | ESA through the CINDI-2 ; ESA through the FRM4DOAS ; EU 7 Framework Programme QA4ECV ; Austrian Science Fund (FWF) ; Canadian Space Agency (AVATARS project) ; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (PAHA project) ; Canada Foundation for Innovation |
| 源URL | [http://ir.hfcas.ac.cn:8080/handle/334002/103891]  |
| 专题 | 中国科学院合肥物质科学研究院 |
| 通讯作者 | Donner, Sebastian |
| 作者单位 | 1.German Aerosp Ctr, Inst Protect Maritime Infrastruct, Bremerhaven, Germany 2.Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci, Inst Meteorol, Vienna, Austria 3.Anhui Inst Opt & Fine Mech, Hefei, Peoples R China 4.Environm & Climate Change Canada, Air Qual Res Div, Toronto, ON, Canada 5.CMA Meteorol Observat Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China 6.Chinese Acad Meteorol Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China 7.Max Planck Inst Chem, Mainz, Germany 8.Heidelberg Univ, Inst Environm Phys, Heidelberg, Germany 9.BIRA IASB Royal Belgian Inst Space Aeron, Brussels, Belgium 10.Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Lab Atmospher Phys, Thessaloniki, Greece |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Donner, Sebastian,Kuhn, Jonas,Van Roozendael, Michel,et al. Evaluating different methods for elevation calibration of MAX-DOAS (Multi AXis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy) instruments during the CINDI-2 campaign[J]. ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES,2020,13. |
| APA | Donner, Sebastian.,Kuhn, Jonas.,Van Roozendael, Michel.,Bais, Alkiviadis.,Beirle, Steffen.,...&Wagner, Thomas.(2020).Evaluating different methods for elevation calibration of MAX-DOAS (Multi AXis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy) instruments during the CINDI-2 campaign.ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES,13. |
| MLA | Donner, Sebastian,et al."Evaluating different methods for elevation calibration of MAX-DOAS (Multi AXis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy) instruments during the CINDI-2 campaign".ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES 13(2020). |
入库方式： OAI收割
来源：合肥物质科学研究院
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。