中国科学院机构知识库网格
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid
首页 机构 成果 学者
  
  1. CAS IR Grid
  2. 地理科学与资源研究所
  3. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所
Optimization of reduced chemical fertilizer use in tea gardens based on the assessment of related environmental and economic benefits

文献类型：期刊论文

作者Wang, Ziteng1,2; Geng, Yuanbo1; Liang, Tao1
刊名SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
出版日期2020-04-15
卷号713页码:13
关键词Tea garden Chemical fertilizer reduction Soil nutrients content NP runoff loss Tea yield and quality Revenue
ISSN号0048-9697
DOI10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136439
通讯作者Geng, Yuanbo(gengyb@igsnrr.ac.cn) ; Liang, Tao(liangt@igsnrr.ac.cn)
英文摘要Chemical fertilizer application is the primary method used to maintain tea yield and quality, but has a negative environmental impact owing to its excessive use. This study sought to assess the environmental and economic benefits of three different chemical fertilizer reduction modes: Single reduction of chemical fertilizer (SRCF), combined application of organic and chemical fertilizer (CAOF), and controlled-release fertilizer substitute (CRFS). Differences in soil nutrient content, NP (NH4+-N, NO3-N and total P) runoff loss, tea yield and quality, and the revenue of tea planting across different fertilizer reduction treatments were then discussed. We also analyzed the coupling effects of these different fertilization modes, fertilization rate and time on soil NP runoff loss, which allowed us to determine the optimum fertilization method based on differences in their respective environmental and economic benefits. Our results revealed differences in soil nutrient content, tea yield and quality, NP runoff loss, and revenue owing to tea planting across the different fertilization treatments. Soil pH after fertilization was significantly lower than before fertilization. CAOF was beneficial and improved soil nutrients as well as tea yield and quality. Of the tested methods, 50% combined application of organic and chemical fertilizer (CAOF2) was the best, as it resulted in the best tea quality and yield. CAOF2 also had the highest revenue. In addition, it was beneficial in reducing NP runoff loss. CRFS was advantageous in its persistent fertilizer efficiency and reduction in NP runoff loss. With CAOF, NP runoff loss was primarily caused by quick-acting chemical fertilizer. With extended time, NP runoff loss caused by fertilization was gradually decreased. Given our analysis of the environmental and economic benefits of different fertilizer reduction methods, CAOF2 emerged in this study as the best fertilizer reduction treatment option. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
WOS关键词ROOT-ZONE PH ; SOIL ACIDIFICATION ; AGRICULTURAL PHOSPHORUS ; WATER-QUALITY ; NITROGEN ; MANAGEMENT ; RUNOFF ; MANURE ; FIELD ; EUTROPHICATION
资助项目National Key Research and Development Programof China[2016YFD0201208] ; Chinese Academy of Sciences Key Project[XDA23100403]
WOS研究方向Environmental Sciences & Ecology
语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000514544700105
出版者ELSEVIER
资助机构National Key Research and Development Programof China ; Chinese Academy of Sciences Key Project
源URL[http://ir.igsnrr.ac.cn/handle/311030/133507]  
专题中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所
通讯作者Geng, Yuanbo; Liang, Tao
作者单位1.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
2.Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714		 Wang, Ziteng,Geng, Yuanbo,Liang, Tao. Optimization of reduced chemical fertilizer use in tea gardens based on the assessment of related environmental and economic benefits[J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT,2020,713:13.
APA Wang, Ziteng,Geng, Yuanbo,&Liang, Tao.(2020).Optimization of reduced chemical fertilizer use in tea gardens based on the assessment of related environmental and economic benefits.SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT,713,13.
MLA Wang, Ziteng,et al."Optimization of reduced chemical fertilizer use in tea gardens based on the assessment of related environmental and economic benefits".SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 713(2020):13.

入库方式： OAI收割

来源：地理科学与资源研究所

浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本

除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。