Does Approach-Avoidance Behavior in Response to Ambiguous Cues Reflect Depressive Interpretation Bias? Related but Distinct
文献类型:期刊论文
作者 | Lin, Xiao-Xiao2,3; Si, Shang-Wen1; Gao, Rui-Rui2,3; Sun, Ya-Bin2,3![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
刊名 | COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH
![]() |
出版日期 | 2020-07-14 |
卷号 | 44页码:1091–1105 |
关键词 | Interpretation bias Depression Ambiguity Judgement bias test Approach-avoidance |
ISSN号 | 0147-5916 |
DOI | 10.1007/s10608-020-10133-0 |
产权排序 | 1 |
文献子类 | article |
英文摘要 | Background There has been a recent surge of interest in the development of the Judgement Bias Test (JBT) as a translational assay and objective measure of depressive interpretation bias. Judgement bias, namely the tendency of favoring an approach/avoidance response towards ambiguous cues, is thought to reflect a biased interpretation or anticipation of the cues. However, no study has examined the relationship between judgement bias and depressive interpretation bias. Methods We validated the JBT against established measurements of interpretation bias in a college sample (Study 1) and an adolescent sample (Study 2). Results In both samples, a negative judgement bias was significantly associated with a depressive interpretation bias. However, the strength of the associations was only moderate and failed to meet the minimum qualification of convergent validity. Conclusions Our results suggest that judgement bias and interpretation bias might be related but distinct. The JBT should not be used as an indirect assessment of interpretation bias in its current form, and it would be premature to claim that animal studies using the JBT could inform our understanding of cognitive biases in mood disorders. Nevertheless, the JBT might be useful for studying specific mechanisms, such as reward processing under ambiguity. |
WOS关键词 | NEGATIVE INTERPRETATION BIAS ; HAMILTON-PLEASURE SCALE ; INVENTORY-SHORT VERSION ; EMOTIONAL DISORDERS ; COGNITIVE BIAS ; RISK-TAKING ; AFFECT SCHEDULE ; ANXIETY ; MOOD ; VALIDATION |
资助项目 | NNSF (National Natural Science Foundation of China)[31471061] ; NNSF (National Natural Science Foundation of China)[31970926] ; NNSF (National Natural Science Foundation of China)[31271092] ; NNSF (National Natural Science Foundation of China)[31671140] ; Scientific Foundation of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences[Y9CX441005] ; CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology[KLMH 2014G01] ; CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology[KLMH2016K02] ; initiation fund of the CAS/SAFEA International Partnership Program for Creative Research Teams[Y2CX131003] |
WOS研究方向 | Psychology |
语种 | 英语 |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000548466400001 |
出版者 | SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS |
资助机构 | NNSF (National Natural Science Foundation of China) ; Scientific Foundation of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences ; CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology ; initiation fund of the CAS/SAFEA International Partnership Program for Creative Research Teams |
源URL | [http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/32256] ![]() |
专题 | 心理研究所_中国科学院心理健康重点实验室 |
通讯作者 | Wang, Jin-Yan |
作者单位 | 1.Beijing 101 Middle Sch, Beijing, Peoples R China 2.Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Dept Psychol, Beijing, Peoples R China 3.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, CAS Key Lab Mental Hlth, 16 Lincui Rd, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Lin, Xiao-Xiao,Si, Shang-Wen,Gao, Rui-Rui,et al. Does Approach-Avoidance Behavior in Response to Ambiguous Cues Reflect Depressive Interpretation Bias? Related but Distinct[J]. COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH,2020,44:1091–1105. |
APA | Lin, Xiao-Xiao.,Si, Shang-Wen.,Gao, Rui-Rui.,Sun, Ya-Bin.,Wang, Yu-Zheng.,...&Wang, Jin-Yan.(2020).Does Approach-Avoidance Behavior in Response to Ambiguous Cues Reflect Depressive Interpretation Bias? Related but Distinct.COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH,44,1091–1105. |
MLA | Lin, Xiao-Xiao,et al."Does Approach-Avoidance Behavior in Response to Ambiguous Cues Reflect Depressive Interpretation Bias? Related but Distinct".COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH 44(2020):1091–1105. |
入库方式: OAI收割
来源:心理研究所
其他版本
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。