Fate of mercury in two CFB utility boilers with different fueled coals and air pollution control devices
文献类型:期刊论文
作者 | Xinyu Li; Zhonggen Li; Chengcheng Fu; Li Tang; Ji Chen; Tingting Wu; Che-Jen Lin; Xinbin Feng; Xuewu Fu |
刊名 | Fuel
![]() |
出版日期 | 2019 |
卷号 | 251页码:651 - 659 |
关键词 | Circulating Fluidized Bed (Cfb) Boiler mercury speciation removal Efficiency emission Factor |
英文摘要 | Mercury (Hg) emitted from two circulating fluidized bed (CFB) utility boilers (150 MW, P#1 and 300 MW, P#2) in Guizhou province, Southwest China, was characterized. P#1 used anthracite coal and was equipped with in-furnace desulfurization (IFD) and electrostatic precipitator (ESP). P#2 co-burned gangue and coal slime and was equipped with selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR), ESP, fabric filter (FF) and limestone gypsum wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD). Flue gas samples from the inlets and outlets of air pollution control devices (APCDs) in the two plants were analyzed using the Ontario Hydro Method (OHM). Solid samples including feed coal, limestone, bottom ash, fly ash and gypsum were also collected and analyzed. Hg removal efficiency by the APCDs and Hg emission factors (MEFs) were estimated. Total Hg (THg) in the flue gas at the inlet of ESP are 32.3 µg·m−3 and 15.3 µg·m−3 for P#1 and P#2, respectively, both dominated (95.11–99.26%) by the particulate form (Hgp). THg decreased significantly to 0.19–0.24 µg·m−3 at the final APCDs outlets of these two power plants, yielding an overall Hg removal efficiency of 98.53–99.41% for THg. Mass balance analysis indicated that >97% of Hg in coals ended up in captured fly ash. MEFs of the two tested power plants are relatively lower than the values typically found in CFB and pulverized coal (PC) utility boiler power plants. The emission data of Hg from CFB coal-fired power plants should be updated and attention should be directed to the secondary emission/release of Hg from the captured fly ash. |
语种 | 英语 |
源URL | [http://ir.gyig.ac.cn/handle/42920512-1/10475] ![]() |
专题 | 地球化学研究所_环境地球化学国家重点实验室 |
作者单位 | 1.State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang 550081, China 2.Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Lamar University, Beaumont, TX 77710, USA 3.Center for Advances in Water and Air Quality, Lamar University, Beaumont, TX 77710, USA 4.Guizhou Environmental Monitoring Center, Guiyang 550081, China 5.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Xinyu Li;Zhonggen Li;Chengcheng Fu;Li Tang;Ji Chen;Tingting Wu;Che-Jen Lin;Xinbin Feng;Xuewu Fu. Fate of mercury in two CFB utility boilers with different fueled coals and air pollution control devices[J]. Fuel,2019,251:651 - 659. |
APA | Xinyu Li;Zhonggen Li;Chengcheng Fu;Li Tang;Ji Chen;Tingting Wu;Che-Jen Lin;Xinbin Feng;Xuewu Fu.(2019).Fate of mercury in two CFB utility boilers with different fueled coals and air pollution control devices.Fuel,251,651 - 659. |
MLA | Xinyu Li;Zhonggen Li;Chengcheng Fu;Li Tang;Ji Chen;Tingting Wu;Che-Jen Lin;Xinbin Feng;Xuewu Fu."Fate of mercury in two CFB utility boilers with different fueled coals and air pollution control devices".Fuel 251(2019):651 - 659. |
入库方式: OAI收割
来源:地球化学研究所
其他版本
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。