中国科学院机构知识库网格
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid
Phylogenetic evidence for Sino-Tibetan origin in northern China in the Late Neolithic

文献类型:期刊论文

作者Zhang, Menghan5,6,7; Jin, Li5,6,8; Yan, Shi1,8; Pan, Wuyun2,4; Jin, Li3; ,
刊名NATURE
出版日期2019
卷号569期号:7754页码:112-+
关键词SIRT6 angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 connective tissue growth factor fibrosis myocardial injury
ISSN号0028-0836
DOI10.1038/s41586-019-1153-z
文献子类Article
英文摘要The study of language origin and divergence is important for understanding the history of human populations and their cultures. The Sino-Tibetan language family is the second largest in the world after Indo-European, and there is a long-running debate about its phylogeny and the time depth of its original divergence(1). Here we perform a Bayesian phylogenetic analysis to examine two competing hypotheses of the origin of the Sino-Tibetan language family: the 'northern-origin hypothesis' and the 'southwestern-origin hypothesis'. The northern-origin hypothesis states that the initial expansion of Sino-Tibetan languages occurred approximately 4,0006,000 years before present (BP; taken as AD 1950) in the Yellow River basin of northern China(2-4), and that this expansion is associated with the development of the Yangshao and/or Majiayao Neolithic cultures. The southwestern-origin hypothesis states that an early expansion of Sino-Tibetan languages occurred before 9,000 years bp from a region in southwest Sichuan province in China(5) or in northeast India(6), where a high diversity of Tibeto-Burman languages exists today. Consistent with the northern-origin hypothesis, our Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of 109 languages with 949 lexical root-meanings produced an estimated time depth for the divergence of Sino-Tibetan languages of approximately 4,200-7,800 years bp, with an average value of approximately 5,900 years bp. In addition, the phylogeny supported a dichotomy between Sinitic and Tibeto-Burman languages. Our results are compatible with the archaeological records, and with the farming and language dispersal hypothesis(7) of agricultural expansion in China. Our findings provide a linguistic foothold for further interdisciplinary studies of prehistoric human activity in East Asia.
学科主题Science & Technology - Other Topics
WOS关键词LANGUAGE ; EXPANSION
语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000466523700043
出版者NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
版本出版稿
源URL[http://202.127.25.144/handle/331004/1299]  
专题中国科学院上海生命科学研究院营养科学研究所
作者单位1.Fudan Univ, Sch Life Sci, Dept Anthropol & Human Genet, Key Lab Contemporary Anthropol,Minist Educ, Shanghai, Peoples R China;
2.Fudan Univ, Inst Humanities & Social Sci Data, Sch Data Sci, Shanghai, Peoples R China;
3.Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Computat Biol, CAS MPG Partner Inst Computat Biol, SIBS, Shanghai, Peoples R China,
4.Shanghai Normal Univ, Inst Linguist, Coll Humanities & Commun, Shanghai, Peoples R China;
5.Fudan Univ, Sch Life Sci, State Key Lab Genet Engn, Shanghai, Peoples R China;
6.Fudan Univ, Sch Life Sci, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Genet & Dev, Shanghai, Peoples R China;
7.Fudan Univ, Inst Modern Languages & Linguist, Shanghai, Peoples R China;
8.Fudan Univ, Human Phenome Inst, Shanghai, Peoples R China;
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Zhang, Menghan,Jin, Li,Yan, Shi,et al. Phylogenetic evidence for Sino-Tibetan origin in northern China in the Late Neolithic[J]. NATURE,2019,569(7754):112-+.
APA Zhang, Menghan,Jin, Li,Yan, Shi,Pan, Wuyun,Jin, Li,&,.(2019).Phylogenetic evidence for Sino-Tibetan origin in northern China in the Late Neolithic.NATURE,569(7754),112-+.
MLA Zhang, Menghan,et al."Phylogenetic evidence for Sino-Tibetan origin in northern China in the Late Neolithic".NATURE 569.7754(2019):112-+.

入库方式: OAI收割

来源:上海营养与健康研究所

浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。