中国科学院机构知识库网格
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid
Comparison of different methods for assessing effects of soil interparticle forces on aggregate stability

文献类型:期刊论文

作者Liu, Jingfang1; Hu, Feinan1,2; Xu, Chenyang1; Wang, Zilong1; Ma, Rentian1; Zhao, Shiwei1,2; Liu, Gang1,2
刊名GEODERMA
出版日期2021-03-01
卷号385页码:8
ISSN号0016-7061
关键词Aggregate stability Electrostatic repulsive force Van der Waals force Raindrop impact Rainfall simulation
DOI10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114834
通讯作者Hu, Feinan(hufn@nwafu.edu.cn)
英文摘要Soil interparticle forces, involving in van der Waals attractive force, and surface hydration and electrostatic repulsive forces, greatly influence the soil aggregate stability. However, current studies on methods for evaluating the impact of soil interparticle forces in aggregate stability are scarce. This research was aimed to examine the impact of soil interparticle forces on aggregate stability using diverse methods for different soil types. Soil aggregate stability was tested through the pipette method, wet sieving, and rainfall simulation, respectively characterized by aggregate stability index (ASI), mean weight diameter (MWD), and splash erosion mass (SE). Soil interparticle forces were adjusted by the changing concentrations of NaCl solution. The results showed that all three approaches can be applied to study the impact of soil interparticle forces on aggregate stability. The ASI, MWD, and SE showed little change below 10(-2) mol L-1 NaCl concentration and then ASI and MWD increased at a high rate above 10(-2) mol L-1 concentration of NaCl, while the SE showed the opposite trend. These results were as expected for soil interparticle forces. Moreover, for a single soil, a substantial correlation existed between the aggregate stability indicators obtained from three methods. However, the order of soil aggregate stability, measured by three methods were varied among soil types. Our results suggest that a single method cannot be applied to determine the aggregate stability of all soil types even if the breakdown mechanism was identical, because organic matter content and particle size distribution of soil are important factors influencing aggregate stability. Hence, in order to compare the difference in aggregate stability between various soils, multiple methods should be considered to investigate the impact of interparticle forces of soil on its aggregate stability. If a single method was to be chosen, wet sieving may be a good choice as it was not only relatively simple and time-saving but also reflected more comprehensive information about sizes and amount of fragments released from soil aggregates.
WOS关键词PARTICLE INTERACTION FORCES ; RAINDROP IMPACT ; LOESS PLATEAU ; ORGANIC-MATTER ; EROSION ; RUNOFF ; TRANSPORT ; QUALITY ; ERODIBILITY ; BREAKDOWN
资助项目National Key R&D Program of China[2016YFE0202900] ; National Natural Science Foundation of China[41977024] ; National Natural Science Foundation of China[41601236] ; National Natural Science Foundation of China[41701261]
WOS研究方向Agriculture
语种英语
出版者ELSEVIER
WOS记录号WOS:000609999200006
资助机构National Key R&D Program of China ; National Natural Science Foundation of China
源URL[http://ir.igsnrr.ac.cn/handle/311030/136174]  
专题中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所
通讯作者Hu, Feinan
作者单位1.Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Nat Resources & Environm, State Key Lab Soil Eros & Dryland Farming Loess P, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
2.Chinese Acad Sci & Minist Water Resources, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Liu, Jingfang,Hu, Feinan,Xu, Chenyang,et al. Comparison of different methods for assessing effects of soil interparticle forces on aggregate stability[J]. GEODERMA,2021,385:8.
APA Liu, Jingfang.,Hu, Feinan.,Xu, Chenyang.,Wang, Zilong.,Ma, Rentian.,...&Liu, Gang.(2021).Comparison of different methods for assessing effects of soil interparticle forces on aggregate stability.GEODERMA,385,8.
MLA Liu, Jingfang,et al."Comparison of different methods for assessing effects of soil interparticle forces on aggregate stability".GEODERMA 385(2021):8.

入库方式: OAI收割

来源:地理科学与资源研究所

浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。