A quantitative review of water footprint accounting and simulation for crop production based on publications during 2002-2018
文献类型：期刊论文
| 作者 | Feng, Bianbian2,4; Zhuo, La1,3; Xie, Dong2,4; Mao, Ying2,4; Gao, Jie2,4; Xie, Pengxuan2,4; Wu, Pute1,3 |
| 刊名 | ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
 |
| 出版日期 | 2021 |
| 卷号 | 120页码:10 |
| 关键词 | Quantification methods Spatial scales Uncertainty |
| ISSN号 | 1470-160X |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106962 |
| 通讯作者 | Zhuo, La(zhuola@nwafu.edu.cn) |
| 英文摘要 | The water footprint (WF) of crop production has been widely accepted as a comprehensive indicator of agri-cultural water consumption. Rationality and accuracy in crop WF accounting are thus prerequisites for implementation of WF assessments that yield sustainable regional agricultural water management. However, few studies have focused on the rationality of multiple quantitative approaches and the associated differences in crop WF accounting among different studies. Here we, focusing on maize, wheat and rice, review quantitatively the effects of different quantification approaches and scales on the results of crop WF accounting and simulations in relevant published research during 2002-2018 worldwide. Results show that (i) The number of studies on crop WF accounting has increased by 17 times since 2002 (similar to the year of creation of WF concepts); the research direction is focused on improvement of quantification and resolution in both time and space. (ii) The current approaches to WF calculation can be divided into five main types: the field crop water requirement (FCWR) approach, field soil water balance (FSWB) approach, regional water balance (RWB) approach, remote sensing (RS) approach and field measured water balance (FMWB) approach. The FCWR and FSWB approaches are more widely adopted than the other three. (iii) There were non-negligible differences in the WF accounting results among approaches and scales. At the global level, the deviations in WF for maize, wheat, and rice were relatively low among different studies, with the world average values of 0.73 m(3) kg(-1) +/- 14.9%, 1.136 m(3) kg(-1) +/- 13.5%, and 1.269 m(3) kg(-1) +/- 27%, respectively. The ranges of uncertainty varied significantly when downscaling to specific countries and provinces. The maximum coefficients of variation (CV) of WF for maize, wheat, and rice in different regions were up to 40%, 49%, and 50%, respectively. (iv) The WF simulations showed very reasonable agreement and lower deviation between the FCWR and FSWB approaches. |
| WOS关键词 | ENVIRONMENTAL-CONDITIONS ; AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION ; IRRIGATION DISTRICT ; MAIZE PRODUCTION ; GRAIN PRODUCTION ; CLIMATE-CHANGE ; RIVER-BASIN ; PADDY RICE ; GREEN ; BLUE |
| 资助项目 | National Key Research and Development Plan[2018YFF0215702] ; National Natural Science Foundation of China[51809215] ; West Light Talent Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences |
| WOS研究方向 | Biodiversity & Conservation ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| WOS记录号 | WOS:000591906400008 |
| 出版者 | ELSEVIER |
| 资助机构 | National Key Research and Development Plan ; National Natural Science Foundation of China ; West Light Talent Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences |
| 源URL | [http://ir.igsnrr.ac.cn/handle/311030/137041]  |
| 专题 | 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 |
| 通讯作者 | Zhuo, La |
| 作者单位 | 1.Chinese Acad Sci & Minist Water Resources, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China 2.Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Water Resources & Architectural Engn, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China 3.Northwest A&F Univ, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China 4.Minist Educ, Key Lab Agr Soil & Water Engn Arid & Semiarid Are, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Feng, Bianbian,Zhuo, La,Xie, Dong,et al. A quantitative review of water footprint accounting and simulation for crop production based on publications during 2002-2018[J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS,2021,120:10. |
| APA | Feng, Bianbian.,Zhuo, La.,Xie, Dong.,Mao, Ying.,Gao, Jie.,...&Wu, Pute.(2021).A quantitative review of water footprint accounting and simulation for crop production based on publications during 2002-2018.ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS,120,10. |
| MLA | Feng, Bianbian,et al."A quantitative review of water footprint accounting and simulation for crop production based on publications during 2002-2018".ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS 120(2021):10. |
入库方式： OAI收割
来源：地理科学与资源研究所
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。