Comparison of different irrigation methods to synergistically improve maize's yield, water productivity and economic benefits in an arid irrigation area
文献类型:期刊论文
作者 | Zhang, Tibin2,3,4; Zou, Yufeng2; Kisekka, Isaya4; Biswas, Asim1; Cai, Huanjie2,5 |
刊名 | AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT
![]() |
出版日期 | 2021 |
卷号 | 243页码:11 |
关键词 | The Hetao Irrigation District Border irrigation Furrow irrigation Drip irrigation Crop water consumption Crop water production function |
ISSN号 | 0378-3774 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106497 |
通讯作者 | Cai, Huanjie(caihj@nwafu.edu.cn) |
英文摘要 | Water scarcity is everywhere and more prominent in arid and semi-arid regions. Moreover, water allocation for irrigation is hit by other economic sectors for low per capita profit. It is inevitable to extend higher-efficient irrigations to replace conventional border irrigation. A three-year field experiment was conducted to examine the effects of different irrigation methods on maize's water use and economics in the Hetao Irrigation District of China. Taking 525-mm border irrigation as the control, furrow and drip irrigations at three water levels were implemented. Furrow irrigation included 100 % (450 mm), 80 % (360 mm) and 60 % (270 mm) of the recommended level, while three threshold values of soil matric potential: -10 kPa, -30 kPa, and -50 kPa, were used to trigger drip irrigation. The grain yield, ETc (water consumption for the whole growing season), ETcs (water consumption during a special growth stage), and water productivity were affected significantly by the irrigation methods and water levels. The average ETc of border, furrow and drip irrigations was 537.4 mm, 401.8-514.4 mm, and 306.6-496.2 mm for different levels, respectively. On average 10 % of the irrigation water was lost through deep percolation under border irrigation, while 10.5-29.0 mm of groundwater contributed to ETc under drip irrigation with-50 kPa. The higher Kwc (water consumption coefficient) was observed in R3-R6 (Milk-Maturity) stages under drip than border and furrow irrigations. The lower K-y (yield response factor) of drip (0.68) than furrow (0.82) indicated the lesser reduction in yield induced by the decreased ETc under drip irrigation. The 360-mm furrow irrigation obtained a comparable grain yield and net profit with the control, but reduced water application by 31 %. Drip irrigation at-30 kPa enhanced yield by 15 %, increased net profit by 23 %, and reduced water application by 57 %. Thus, drip irrigation at -30 kPa is recommended as the priority to replace border irrigation for maize production in the study area. If drip irrigation is unavailable, a 360-mm furrow irrigation is also an alternative to reduce water application without compromising benefit. |
WOS关键词 | MULCHED DRIP IRRIGATION ; YELLOW-RIVER BASIN ; USE EFFICIENCY ; DEFICIT IRRIGATION ; PLASTIC MULCH ; SHALLOW GROUNDWATER ; HARVESTING SYSTEM ; FURROW IRRIGATION ; CROP ; SOIL |
资助项目 | National Key R&D Program of China[2017YFC0403303] ; National Natural Science Foundation of China[51879224] ; National Natural Science Foundation of China[51509238] ; China 111 Project[B12007] ; Chinese Scholarship Council[201906305036] |
WOS研究方向 | Agriculture ; Water Resources |
语种 | 英语 |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000594654500003 |
出版者 | ELSEVIER |
资助机构 | National Key R&D Program of China ; National Natural Science Foundation of China ; China 111 Project ; Chinese Scholarship Council |
源URL | [http://ir.igsnrr.ac.cn/handle/311030/137319] ![]() |
专题 | 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 |
通讯作者 | Cai, Huanjie |
作者单位 | 1.Univ Guelph, Sch Environm Sci, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada 2.Northwest A&F Univ, Key Lab Agr Soil & Water Engn Arid & Semiarid Are, Minist Educ, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China 3.Chinese Acad Sci & Minist Water Resources, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China 4.Univ Calif Davis, Dept Land Air & Water Resources, Davis, CA 95616 USA 5.Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Water Resources & Architectural Engn, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Zhang, Tibin,Zou, Yufeng,Kisekka, Isaya,et al. Comparison of different irrigation methods to synergistically improve maize's yield, water productivity and economic benefits in an arid irrigation area[J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT,2021,243:11. |
APA | Zhang, Tibin,Zou, Yufeng,Kisekka, Isaya,Biswas, Asim,&Cai, Huanjie.(2021).Comparison of different irrigation methods to synergistically improve maize's yield, water productivity and economic benefits in an arid irrigation area.AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT,243,11. |
MLA | Zhang, Tibin,et al."Comparison of different irrigation methods to synergistically improve maize's yield, water productivity and economic benefits in an arid irrigation area".AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT 243(2021):11. |
入库方式: OAI收割
来源:地理科学与资源研究所
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。