中国科学院机构知识库网格
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid
Comparison of different irrigation methods to synergistically improve maize's yield, water productivity and economic benefits in an arid irrigation area

文献类型:期刊论文

作者Zhang, Tibin2,3,4; Zou, Yufeng2; Kisekka, Isaya4; Biswas, Asim1; Cai, Huanjie2,5
刊名AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT
出版日期2021
卷号243页码:11
关键词The Hetao Irrigation District Border irrigation Furrow irrigation Drip irrigation Crop water consumption Crop water production function
ISSN号0378-3774
DOI10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106497
通讯作者Cai, Huanjie(caihj@nwafu.edu.cn)
英文摘要Water scarcity is everywhere and more prominent in arid and semi-arid regions. Moreover, water allocation for irrigation is hit by other economic sectors for low per capita profit. It is inevitable to extend higher-efficient irrigations to replace conventional border irrigation. A three-year field experiment was conducted to examine the effects of different irrigation methods on maize's water use and economics in the Hetao Irrigation District of China. Taking 525-mm border irrigation as the control, furrow and drip irrigations at three water levels were implemented. Furrow irrigation included 100 % (450 mm), 80 % (360 mm) and 60 % (270 mm) of the recommended level, while three threshold values of soil matric potential: -10 kPa, -30 kPa, and -50 kPa, were used to trigger drip irrigation. The grain yield, ETc (water consumption for the whole growing season), ETcs (water consumption during a special growth stage), and water productivity were affected significantly by the irrigation methods and water levels. The average ETc of border, furrow and drip irrigations was 537.4 mm, 401.8-514.4 mm, and 306.6-496.2 mm for different levels, respectively. On average 10 % of the irrigation water was lost through deep percolation under border irrigation, while 10.5-29.0 mm of groundwater contributed to ETc under drip irrigation with-50 kPa. The higher Kwc (water consumption coefficient) was observed in R3-R6 (Milk-Maturity) stages under drip than border and furrow irrigations. The lower K-y (yield response factor) of drip (0.68) than furrow (0.82) indicated the lesser reduction in yield induced by the decreased ETc under drip irrigation. The 360-mm furrow irrigation obtained a comparable grain yield and net profit with the control, but reduced water application by 31 %. Drip irrigation at-30 kPa enhanced yield by 15 %, increased net profit by 23 %, and reduced water application by 57 %. Thus, drip irrigation at -30 kPa is recommended as the priority to replace border irrigation for maize production in the study area. If drip irrigation is unavailable, a 360-mm furrow irrigation is also an alternative to reduce water application without compromising benefit.
WOS关键词MULCHED DRIP IRRIGATION ; YELLOW-RIVER BASIN ; USE EFFICIENCY ; DEFICIT IRRIGATION ; PLASTIC MULCH ; SHALLOW GROUNDWATER ; HARVESTING SYSTEM ; FURROW IRRIGATION ; CROP ; SOIL
资助项目National Key R&D Program of China[2017YFC0403303] ; National Natural Science Foundation of China[51879224] ; National Natural Science Foundation of China[51509238] ; China 111 Project[B12007] ; Chinese Scholarship Council[201906305036]
WOS研究方向Agriculture ; Water Resources
语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000594654500003
出版者ELSEVIER
资助机构National Key R&D Program of China ; National Natural Science Foundation of China ; China 111 Project ; Chinese Scholarship Council
源URL[http://ir.igsnrr.ac.cn/handle/311030/137319]  
专题中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所
通讯作者Cai, Huanjie
作者单位1.Univ Guelph, Sch Environm Sci, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
2.Northwest A&F Univ, Key Lab Agr Soil & Water Engn Arid & Semiarid Are, Minist Educ, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
3.Chinese Acad Sci & Minist Water Resources, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
4.Univ Calif Davis, Dept Land Air & Water Resources, Davis, CA 95616 USA
5.Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Water Resources & Architectural Engn, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Zhang, Tibin,Zou, Yufeng,Kisekka, Isaya,et al. Comparison of different irrigation methods to synergistically improve maize's yield, water productivity and economic benefits in an arid irrigation area[J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT,2021,243:11.
APA Zhang, Tibin,Zou, Yufeng,Kisekka, Isaya,Biswas, Asim,&Cai, Huanjie.(2021).Comparison of different irrigation methods to synergistically improve maize's yield, water productivity and economic benefits in an arid irrigation area.AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT,243,11.
MLA Zhang, Tibin,et al."Comparison of different irrigation methods to synergistically improve maize's yield, water productivity and economic benefits in an arid irrigation area".AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT 243(2021):11.

入库方式: OAI收割

来源:地理科学与资源研究所

浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。