Comparison model learning methods for methane emission prediction of reservoirs on a regional field scale: Performance and adaptation of methods with different experimental datasets
文献类型:期刊论文
作者 | Li, Gang1,3; Yang, Meng1,2; Zhang, Yunmo4; Grace, John5; Lu, Cai1; Zeng, Qing1; Jia, Yifei1; Liu, Yunzhu1; Lei, Jialin1; Geng, Xuemeng1,6 |
刊名 | ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
![]() |
出版日期 | 2020-10-01 |
卷号 | 157页码:9 |
关键词 | Machine Statistical learning methods Model adaptation Methane Reservoir IPCC |
ISSN号 | 0925-8574 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105990 |
通讯作者 | Lei, Guangchun(guangchun.lei@foxmail.com) ; Chen, Ying(chenying@cau.edu.cn) |
英文摘要 | In this study, we explored different methods to build methane emissions prediction models of temperate reservoirs on a regional field scale, and then we examined the performances and adaptation of these prediction models. First, four statistical model learning methods and two machine learning methods were used to develop methane emissions prediction models based on environmental factors (i.e., temperature and atmospheric pressure) and methane fluxes at three reservoirs (Miyun, Yudushan, and Baihepu) in Beijing, China, from 2009 to 2012. In general, decision trees (DT) exhibited better performance with higher r(2) (the coefficient of determination) and lower root mean squared error, mean deviation, mean squared error, and mean absolute error. Second, in order to examine model adaptation, two experimental datasets were used to build methane emissions prediction models separately: D1 (samples only from Miyun) and D2 (samples from Miyun, Yudushan, and Baihepu). Then, three test data groups which used samples from the three reservoirs separately were used. In general, decision trees (DT) exhibited better performance and adaptation compared to those of other model learning methods. Moreover, our study indicated that it could be necessary to compare greenhouse gas prediction models when compiling greenhouse gas inventories according to IPCC. |
WOS关键词 | GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS ; FRESH-WATER ; DECISION TREE ; FLUXES ; TEMPERATURE ; REGRESSION ; DIFFUSION ; PONDS ; LAKES |
资助项目 | Anhui Jianzhu University[2019QDZ58/K1930117] ; Anhui province[SK22015A720] |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Engineering |
语种 | 英语 |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000573277800013 |
出版者 | ELSEVIER |
资助机构 | Anhui Jianzhu University ; Anhui province |
源URL | [http://ir.igsnrr.ac.cn/handle/311030/157023] ![]() |
专题 | 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 |
通讯作者 | Lei, Guangchun; Chen, Ying |
作者单位 | 1.Beijing Forestry Univ, Nat Conservat, Sch Ecol & Nat Conservat, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China 2.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Ecosyst Network Observat & Modeling, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China 3.Anhui Jianzhu Univ, Sch Architecture & Urban Planning, Hefei 230022, Peoples R China 4.China Agr Univ, Coll Informat & Elect Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China 5.Univ Edinburgh, Sch Geosci, Edinburgh EH9 3FF, Midlothian, Scotland 6.Beijing Shoufa Tianren Ecol Landscape CO Ltd, Beijing 102600, Peoples R China |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Li, Gang,Yang, Meng,Zhang, Yunmo,et al. Comparison model learning methods for methane emission prediction of reservoirs on a regional field scale: Performance and adaptation of methods with different experimental datasets[J]. ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING,2020,157:9. |
APA | Li, Gang.,Yang, Meng.,Zhang, Yunmo.,Grace, John.,Lu, Cai.,...&Chen, Ying.(2020).Comparison model learning methods for methane emission prediction of reservoirs on a regional field scale: Performance and adaptation of methods with different experimental datasets.ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING,157,9. |
MLA | Li, Gang,et al."Comparison model learning methods for methane emission prediction of reservoirs on a regional field scale: Performance and adaptation of methods with different experimental datasets".ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING 157(2020):9. |
入库方式: OAI收割
来源:地理科学与资源研究所
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。