Assessment of IRI-2016 hmF2 model options with digisonde, COSMIC and ISR observations for low and high solar flux conditions
文献类型：期刊论文
| 作者 | Huang, He4,5,7; Moses, Mefe3,6; Volk, Ayelen E.1,2; Abu Elezz, Ola11; Kassamba, Abdel Aziz10; Biltza, Dieter8,9 |
| 刊名 | ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH
 |
| 出版日期 | 2021-09-01 |
| 卷号 | 68期号:5页码:2093-2103 |
| 关键词 | IRI model hmF2 model options Low and high solar fluxes |
| ISSN号 | 0273-1177 |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.asr.2021.01.033 |
| 英文摘要 | The attempt of this work is to evaluate the three options (BSE-1979, AMTB-2013, SHU-2015) embedded in IRI-2016 for the F2 layer peak height (hmF2) estimation under low and high solar flux levels. We compare the model hmF2 with digisonde observations from Qaanaaq, Milllstone Hill, Ramey, Jicamarca and Port Stanley as well as Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere and Climate (COSMIC) ionospheric radio occultation data over the five stations spanning from northern hemisphere to southern hemi-sphere. In the case of Millstone Hill, we also use incoherent scatter radar (ISR) measurements. For the comparison with digisonde data, SHU-2015 is the most accurate option for reproducing hmF2 at low and middle latitude stations (Milllstone Hill, Ramey, Jicamarca) with the smallest Root-Mean-Square-Error and the highest correlation with observations. At high latitude (Qaanaaq and Port Stanley), BSE-1979 becomes the best option. This is true for both low and high solar flux conditions. Similar results are obtained for the compar-ison between ISR and IRI-2016 hmF2 model options over Millstone Hill, where SHU-2015 option has the smallest deviations from the observation data in both low and high solar activity conditions. As for the comparison with COSMIC data, SHU-2015 edges out the other two options under low solar activity level with better performance at three stations. There is no optimal option under high solar activity level, which is to our surprise, cause SHU-2015 was developed based on a large amount of radio occultation data. At Jicamarca, all options show dramatic deviations from COSMIC observations, showing even negative correlations. We propose that the performance of the three options do not vary much with solar condition, while they differ a lot with location, for example, latitude. (C) 2021 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
| WOS关键词 | IONOSPHERIC ELECTRON-DENSITY ; VALIDATION ; PROFILES ; HEIGHT ; REGION ; PREDICTIONS ; PERFORMANCE ; LATITUDES ; BEHAVIOR |
| 资助项目 | National Natural Science Foundation of China[41704157] ; National Natural Science Foundation of China[41774161] ; National Natural Science Foundation of China[41621063] ; China Postdoc-toral Science Foundation[2016M601120] ; Strategic Prior-ity Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences[XDB 41000000] |
| WOS研究方向 | Engineering ; Astronomy & Astrophysics ; Geology ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| WOS记录号 | WOS:000678026000005 |
| 出版者 | ELSEVIER SCI LTD |
| 资助机构 | National Natural Science Foundation of China ; National Natural Science Foundation of China ; National Natural Science Foundation of China ; National Natural Science Foundation of China ; China Postdoc-toral Science Foundation ; China Postdoc-toral Science Foundation ; China Postdoc-toral Science Foundation ; China Postdoc-toral Science Foundation ; Strategic Prior-ity Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences ; Strategic Prior-ity Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences ; Strategic Prior-ity Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences ; Strategic Prior-ity Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences ; National Natural Science Foundation of China ; National Natural Science Foundation of China ; National Natural Science Foundation of China ; National Natural Science Foundation of China ; China Postdoc-toral Science Foundation ; China Postdoc-toral Science Foundation ; China Postdoc-toral Science Foundation ; China Postdoc-toral Science Foundation ; Strategic Prior-ity Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences ; Strategic Prior-ity Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences ; Strategic Prior-ity Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences ; Strategic Prior-ity Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences ; National Natural Science Foundation of China ; National Natural Science Foundation of China ; National Natural Science Foundation of China ; National Natural Science Foundation of China ; China Postdoc-toral Science Foundation ; China Postdoc-toral Science Foundation ; China Postdoc-toral Science Foundation ; China Postdoc-toral Science Foundation ; Strategic Prior-ity Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences ; Strategic Prior-ity Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences ; Strategic Prior-ity Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences ; Strategic Prior-ity Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences ; National Natural Science Foundation of China ; National Natural Science Foundation of China ; National Natural Science Foundation of China ; National Natural Science Foundation of China ; China Postdoc-toral Science Foundation ; China Postdoc-toral Science Foundation ; China Postdoc-toral Science Foundation ; China Postdoc-toral Science Foundation ; Strategic Prior-ity Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences ; Strategic Prior-ity Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences ; Strategic Prior-ity Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences ; Strategic Prior-ity Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences |
| 源URL | [http://ir.iggcas.ac.cn/handle/132A11/101928]  |
| 专题 | 地质与地球物理研究所_中国科学院地球与行星物理重点实验室 |
| 通讯作者 | Huang, He; Moses, Mefe |
| 作者单位 | 1.Natl Sci & Tech Res Council, CONICET, B1904CMC, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina 2.La Plata Natl Univ, Fac Astron & Geophys Sci, B1900FWA, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina 3.Ahmadu Bello Univ, Dept Geomat, Zaria 810282, Kaduna, Nigeria 4.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geol & Geophys, Beijing Natl Observ Space Environm, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China 5.Chinese Acad Sci, Innovat Acad Earth Sci, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China 6.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geol & Geophys, Key Lab Earth & Planetary Phys, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China 7.Natl Inst Nat Hazards, Minist Emergency Management, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China 8.NASA Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Heliospher Lab, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA 9.George Mason Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA 10.Univ Felix Houphouet Boigny, Lab Phys Atmosphere & Mecaniqu & Fluides, UFRS SMT, 01BPV34, Abidjan, Cote Ivoire |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Huang, He,Moses, Mefe,Volk, Ayelen E.,et al. Assessment of IRI-2016 hmF2 model options with digisonde, COSMIC and ISR observations for low and high solar flux conditions[J]. ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH,2021,68(5):2093-2103. |
| APA | Huang, He,Moses, Mefe,Volk, Ayelen E.,Abu Elezz, Ola,Kassamba, Abdel Aziz,&Biltza, Dieter.(2021).Assessment of IRI-2016 hmF2 model options with digisonde, COSMIC and ISR observations for low and high solar flux conditions.ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH,68(5),2093-2103. |
| MLA | Huang, He,et al."Assessment of IRI-2016 hmF2 model options with digisonde, COSMIC and ISR observations for low and high solar flux conditions".ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH 68.5(2021):2093-2103. |
入库方式： OAI收割
来源：地质与地球物理研究所
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。