中国科学院机构知识库网格
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid
Sensitivity/uncertainty comparison and similarity analysis between TMSR-LF1 and MSR models

文献类型:期刊论文

作者Liu, YF; Yan, R; Zou, Y; Yu, SH; Zhou, B; Kang, XZ; Hu, JF; Cai, XZ
刊名PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY
出版日期2020
卷号122页码:-
关键词NUCLEAR-SCIENCE SALT CORE LR-0 SENSITIVITY CRITICALITY LIBRARY DESIGN
ISSN号0149-1970
DOI10.1016/j.pnucene.2020.103289
文献子类期刊论文
英文摘要TMSR-LF1 (Thorium-based Molten Salt Reactor-Liquid Fuel) is the reactor chosen to be developed in the "Thorium molten salt reactor nuclear energy system" project of the Strategic Priority Program launched by the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The software and data library adopted in its design needs to be verified and validated by using benchmarks. In order to guarantee the validity of the verification results, the being-designed reactor should have similarity (index C-k and E >= 0.8) with the benchmark reactor. Using TSUNAMI module and in SCALE 6.1, the Sensitivity/Uncertainty (S/U) analyses and similarity assessments were performed in TMSR-LF1 and the candidate benchmark reactors: MSRE (Molten Salt Reactor Experiment), MSBR (Molten Salt Breeder Reactor) and the Critical Experiment Device (hereafter the device). Uncertainty was calculated using both SCALE and TMSR 44-group covariance data. It is found that the total eigenvalue uncertainties deduced from covariance data in TMSR-LF1 and the candidate benchmark reactors satisfy the +/- 1% design accuracy requirement proposed by M. Ishikawa in 2008, except in MSBR. To meet the accuracy of +/- 0.3%, targeted experiments for TMSR are needed. The covariance data of Li-7, C-graphite, Ni-58 and F-19 were the main contributors to the uncertainty of effective multiplication factor as well as the covariance data of fuel nuclides. The calculated similarity indices indicated that there was a good similarity (C-k and E > 0.9) between TMSR-LF1 and MSRE, and a lesser similarity between TMSR-LF1 and the device (C-k and E > 0.8). The uncertainties should be improved and more benchmarks for the direct verification and validation should be provided by relevant experiments.
语种英语
源URL[http://ir.sinap.ac.cn/handle/331007/33132]  
专题上海应用物理研究所_中科院上海应用物理研究所2011-2017年
作者单位1.Chinese Acad Sci, Shanghai Inst Appl Phys, Shanghai 201800, Peoples R China
2.Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Liu, YF,Yan, R,Zou, Y,et al. Sensitivity/uncertainty comparison and similarity analysis between TMSR-LF1 and MSR models[J]. PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY,2020,122:-.
APA Liu, YF.,Yan, R.,Zou, Y.,Yu, SH.,Zhou, B.,...&Cai, XZ.(2020).Sensitivity/uncertainty comparison and similarity analysis between TMSR-LF1 and MSR models.PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY,122,-.
MLA Liu, YF,et al."Sensitivity/uncertainty comparison and similarity analysis between TMSR-LF1 and MSR models".PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY 122(2020):-.

入库方式: OAI收割

来源:上海应用物理研究所

浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。