中国科学院机构知识库网格
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid
首页 机构 成果 学者
  
  1. CAS IR Grid
  2. 心理研究所
  3. 中国科学院心理研究所
  4. 社会与工程心理学研究室
Motivational Tendency Differences Between the Pre-qin Confucianism and Legalism by Psycholinguistic Analysis

文献类型：期刊论文

作者Hu, Bo1,2; Fan, Miaorong1,2; Huang, Feng1,2; Zhu, Tingshao1,2
刊名FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
出版日期2021-11-11
卷号12页码:8
关键词motivation Confucianism Legalism psycholinguistic LIWC
ISSN号1664-1078
DOI10.3389/fpsyg.2021.724093
通讯作者Zhu, Tingshao(tszhu@psych.ac.cn)
英文摘要Among the hundred schools of thought that flourished during the pre-Qin era, Confucianism and Legalism are the most important ones as their thoughts cast a longstanding influence on the Chinese culture-cultural-psychological formation of the Chinese people. Most of the previous researches focused on analyzing the similarities and differences of the thoughts of Confucianism and Legalism, and few of them analyzed their motivational tendencies. This paper conducted a word frequency analysis of pre-Qin Confucian and Legalist classics with CC-LIWC, an independently developed program for classical text analysis, and made comparative research into the motivational tendencies of the two schools of thought in terms of psycholinguistic differentials. According to our research results, the use of words representing power (M = 0.1377, SD = 0.0104, p = 0.014) and reward (M = 0.0151, SD = 0.0042, p = 0.037) is more frequent in Legalist classics than in Confucian classics, whereas the use of words representing affiliation (p = 0.066), risk (p = 0.086), and achieve (p = 0.27) shows no significant difference between Confucian and Legalist classics. This paper believes that both Confucianism and Legalism are mainly motivated by power, which is the most distinct feature of their motivational tendencies, and that Legalism is more motivated by power and reward than Confucianism; both Confucianism and Legalism are outcomes of the monarchy society with the former showing the reserved side of monarchy and the latter showing the uninhibited side of monarchy; an effective political methodology is absent in Confucianism, while utilitarianism constitutes the cornerstone of the political philosophy of Legalism.
收录类别SCI
WOS研究方向Psychology
语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000725098800001
出版者FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
源URL[http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/41268]  
专题心理研究所_社会与工程心理学研究室
通讯作者Zhu, Tingshao
作者单位1.Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Dept Psychol, Beijing, Peoples R China
2.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, Beijing, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714		 Hu, Bo,Fan, Miaorong,Huang, Feng,et al. Motivational Tendency Differences Between the Pre-qin Confucianism and Legalism by Psycholinguistic Analysis[J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY,2021,12:8.
APA Hu, Bo,Fan, Miaorong,Huang, Feng,&Zhu, Tingshao.(2021).Motivational Tendency Differences Between the Pre-qin Confucianism and Legalism by Psycholinguistic Analysis.FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY,12,8.
MLA Hu, Bo,et al."Motivational Tendency Differences Between the Pre-qin Confucianism and Legalism by Psycholinguistic Analysis".FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY 12(2021):8.

入库方式： OAI收割

来源：心理研究所

浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本

除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。