中国科学院机构知识库网格
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid
危险人格情境化筛查量表编制及信效度检验

文献类型:期刊论文

作者赖海鸥2,3; 侯亮2,3; 周婷2,3; 黄峥2,3
刊名中国健康心理学杂志
出版日期2022
页码10
通讯作者邮箱huangz@psych.ac.cn (黄峥)
关键词危险人格 人格障碍评估 信度 效度 人格特质 情境化
ISSN号1005-3611
其他题名Risk Personality Screening Tool: The Reliability and Validity of Situational Experiences Personality Inventory
产权排序1
文献子类实证研究
中文摘要

Objective:Combined with the interview records of clinicians and the pathological personality traits defined by DSM-V for the antisocial, borderline and paranoid PDs diagnosis,this study are to establish the new screening instrument named risk personality situational experiences inventory and examine its reliability and validity. Methods:In order to promote the accurate expression of the target personality as specified in DSM-V for the three PDs, the statements of these items were contextualized to present daily life events, and the specific situations were given to express its core maladaptive behaviors, motivations, inner emotions and experiences respectively. The Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire PDQ-4+ Chinese version was used as the criterion. A group of 577 people were administered the new situational experience inventory and PDQ-4+. Results:The results show for the 3 PDs the internal consistency reliability is above 0.9, the retest reliability ranges from 0.54 to 0.58(P<0.01), and the standard validity ranges from 0.43 to 0.56(P<0.01). Among the total 577 samples the first group was picked at random (N1=290) for exploratory factor analysis. After revision, 5-factor model was extracted from PD1, 4-factor model was extracted from both PD2 and PD3, which covered the core diagnostic criteria as defined by DSM-V. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to verify the structural stability and model suitability using the remining samples (N2=287), and the result shows the agreement with the factor models. ROC curve analysis was conducted using the new inventory result as independent variables and PDQ-4+ result as dependent variables. When the cut-off value is set as 52.5, 53.5, and 54.5, the AUC value shows as 0.77, 0.75 and 0.74 respectively for PD1, PD2 and PD3. The analysis result shows the positive predictive value is in the moderate range while the negative predictive value is excellent. Conclusion:The new inventory proved the acceptable reliability and validity and can be used as a relatively efficient screening instrument for antisocial, borderline and paranoid PDs diagnosis.

英文摘要

目的:结合临床医生访谈记录和DSM- V界定的病理性人格特质对反社会型、边缘型和偏执型人格障碍进行人格轮廓描述,赋予核心不适应行为、动机和内心体验以具体情境编制成危险人格情境化筛查量表并进行信效度检验。方法:通过网络招募志愿者对18岁以上人群发放电子问卷,对回收的577份有效问卷进行数据分析,效标量表采用Hyler博士编制的人格诊断问卷PDQ-4+(Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire)。结果:危险人格情境化筛查量表包含反社会量表(PD1)25个条目、边缘量表(PD2)22个条目和偏执量表(PD3)24个条目。PD1、PD2和PD3的内部一致性均为0.9(P

收录类别CSCD
项目简介

中国科学院心理健康服务体系心理健康筛查(云测评)系统研发项目(编号:Y9CX341008)

语种中文
源URL[http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/42978]  
专题中国科学院心理研究所
通讯作者黄峥
作者单位1.北京大学医学人文学院医学心理学系
2.中国科学院大学心理学系
3.中国科学院心理研究所
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
赖海鸥,侯亮,周婷,等. 危险人格情境化筛查量表编制及信效度检验[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志,2022:10.
APA 赖海鸥,侯亮,周婷,&黄峥.(2022).危险人格情境化筛查量表编制及信效度检验.中国健康心理学杂志,10.
MLA 赖海鸥,et al."危险人格情境化筛查量表编制及信效度检验".中国健康心理学杂志 (2022):10.

入库方式: OAI收割

来源:心理研究所

浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。