经济发展影响地区腐败的条件过程纵向分析: 道德基础的中介作用及集体主义的调节作用
文献类型：学位论文
| 作者 | 黄峰
|
| 答辩日期 | 2022-06 |
| 文献子类 | 硕士 |
| 授予单位 | 中国科学院大学 |
| 授予地点 | 中国科学院心理研究所 |
| 其他责任者 | 朱廷劭 |
| 关键词 | 经济发展 道德基础 集体主义 腐败 大数据分析 |
| 学位名称 | 理学硕士 |
| 学位专业 | 应用心理 |
| 其他题名 | How does economic growth influence corruption? A longitudinal analysis of the mediation of moral foundations and the moderation of collectivism through a conditional process model |
| 中文摘要 | Corruption refers to the "abuse of entrusted power for private gains", whichseriously affects social stability and is called "political cancer". Research on thecauses and mechanisms of corruption has become an important issue in global socialgovernance. Previous studies have shown that the level of regional economicdevelopment is an important factor affecting corruption, but there is an “East Asianparadox" in the relationship between the two—that is, economic growth is generallyshown to suppress corruption worldwide, but in some Asian countries such as China,the economy and corruption have been growing at the same pace for a long time, andthe underlying mechanism is still unclear. Because corruption usually has highcomplexity, strong organization, and concealment, it is often limited to contain it onlythrough judicial channels, and the prevention of corruption at the psychological levelis very necessary. Morality and cultural values are the two most active topics in theprevious research on the relationship between "economy → corruption". On the onehand, morality may mediate the relationship between economy and corruption as aproximal factor; on the other hand, differences in individualism-collectivismtendencies may be the root cause of regional differences in the relationship betweeneconomy and corruption. An in-depth study of the psychological process andboundary conditions of regional corruption affected by economic growth is not onlythe premise of understanding the causes of the "East Asian Paradox" from the root,but also the key to preventing and reducing regional corruption from thepsychological level. However, the previous studies on the causes of corruption, whichfocused on economics, criminology, and law, are quite different from traditionalpsychological studies in terms of data collection methods and research paradigms, sothat it is difficult for researchers to examine moral factors and factors at the macrolevel. The role of cultural value factors in the "economy → corruption" model. The purpose of this project is to combine text data mining technology andmacroeconomic research paradigm to deeply analyze the mediating role of moralfactors and the moderating role of collectivism in the "Economy → Corruption" model, and attempt to reveal the "East Asian Paradox" from a psychologicalperspective. Causes and processes, which in turn provide potential approaches andtargeted strategies for corruption prevention efforts. This topic mainly carried outthree aspects of research. In Study 1, we examined the combined effects of the "level"and "speed" of economic development in mainland China from 2011 to 2016 on theimportance of collective morality. This study aims to provide scientific inspiration forthe establishment of benign collective morality, and to provide empirical support forfurther examining the mediating role of morality in the "economic → corruption"model. In Study 2, we analyzed the different effects of multiple moral emphasis onthe level of economic development and regional corruption based on a longitudinalmediation model. This study aims to explore the "process" of economic growthaffecting regional corruption—that is, how economic growth affects regionalcorruption through moral factors, thereby providing a way to prevent corruption at thepsychological level. In Study 3, we analyzed the moderating effect of collectivisttendencies in the “economic → moral → corruption” model based on a conditionalprocess model. The research aims to clarify the root causes of the "East AsianParadox" and attempt to develop targeted strategies for corruption prevention from apsychological perspective. The main findings show that: (i) economic growth can indirectly affect regionalcorruption by enhancing people's connected morality (ingroup, authority, andholiness); (ii) authority and holiness are inhibitors of corruption, while ingroupmorality is Corruption risk factors; (iii) In regions or groups with strong collectivisminclinations, economic growth strengthens the morality of ingroups more strongly,which in turn stimulates regional corruption more. To a certain extent, this subjectreveals the psychological process and boundary conditions of economic impact oncorruption. Targeted establishment of people's professional principles—loyalty to law,faith, and order rather than loyalty to "one's own person", and the development ofpublic officials' sensitivity to in-group behavior may help prevent corruption on apsychological level. In addition, compared with individualism, the tendency of highcollectivism will increase the importance of the regional economic level to the morality of people’s in-groups, so it is more likely to produce corrupt climates such ascronyism, favoritism and private use of public power in the region. In view of this,anti-corruption work can be adapted to local conditions, that is, to strengthen anti-corruption propaganda and corruption prevention in areas with strong collectivismtendencies. |
| 英文摘要 | 腐败通常被定义为“滥用职权为自身和他人牟取私利”，其严重影响社会稳定，被称为“政治之癌”。以往研究表明，地区经济发展水平是影响腐败的重要因素，但二者关系存在“东亚悖论”——即经济的增长在世界范围内总体表现为抑制腐败，但在诸如中国的一些亚洲国家，经济与腐败长期保持同步增长，其内在机制尚不明确。由于腐败现象具有复杂性、组织性和隐秘性，仅通过司法途径对其进行遏制效果有限，因此心理层面的腐败预防十分必要。道德和文化价值观是以往“经济→腐败”关系研究中最为活跃的两个话题。一方面，道德可能作为近端因素中介经济与腐败的关系；另一方面，集体主义倾向的差异可能是导致经济与腐败关系存在地区差异的根本原因。深入研究经济增长影响地区腐败的心理过程和边界条件既是从根源上理解“东亚悖论”成因的前提，也是从心理层面预防和减少地区腐败的关键。然而，以往集中于经济学、犯罪学和法学等领域的腐败成因研究与传统的心理学研究在数据采集方式和研究范式方面存在较大差异，以至于研究者很难在宏观层面考察道德因素和文化价值观因素在“经济→腐败”模型中发挥的作用。 本课题旨在结合文本数据挖掘技术和宏观经济学研究范式，深入分析“经济→腐败”模型中道德因素的中介作用以及集体主义倾向的调节作用，尝试从心理学角度揭示“东亚悖论”的产生过程和条件，进而为腐败预防工作提供潜在途径和针对性策略。在研究一中，我们通过建立面板数据模型考察了 2011-2016 年中国大陆地区经济发展“水平”和“速度”对集体道德重视度的综合影响；在研究二中，我们基于纵向中介模型进一步分析了多元道德重视度在经济发展水平与地区腐败之间的不同作用；在研究三中，我们基于条件过程模型分析了集体主义倾向在“经济→道德→腐败”模型中的调节作用，旨在厘清“东亚悖论”存在的根本原因，并尝试从心理学角度为腐败预防工作制定针对性策略。 主要研究结果表明：（i）、经济增长能够通过增强人们联结性道德（内群、权威和圣洁）的方式间接影响地区腐败；（ii）、权威和圣洁道德是腐败的抑制因素，而内群道德是腐败的风险因素；（iii）、在集体主义倾向浓厚的区域或人群中，经济增长对内群道德的强化作用更强，进而对地区腐败刺激作用更大。 本课题在一定程度上揭示了经济影响腐败的心理过程和边界条件。有针对性地建立人们的职业原则——忠诚于法律、信仰和秩序而不是忠于“自己人”，以及培养公职人员对内群行为的敏感性，可能有助于从心理层面预防腐败。此外，相比于个体主义，高集体主义倾向会增强地区经济水平对人们内群道德重视度的提升，因而更有可能在地区上产生任人唯亲、徇私枉法和公权私用等腐败风气。鉴于此，反腐工作可以因“地”制宜，即在集体主义倾向浓厚的地区中加强反腐宣传与腐败预防。 |
| 语种 | 中文 |
| 源URL | [http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/43178]  |
| 专题 | 心理研究所_社会与工程心理学研究室 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | 黄峰. 经济发展影响地区腐败的条件过程纵向分析: 道德基础的中介作用及集体主义的调节作用[D]. 中国科学院心理研究所. 中国科学院大学. 2022. |
入库方式： OAI收割
来源：心理研究所
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。