Spatial Structure, Hierarchy and Formation Mechanisms of Scientific Collaboration Networks: Evidence of the Belt and Road Regions
文献类型：期刊论文
| 作者 | Gu Weinan1,2,3; Liu Hui1,2,3 |
| 刊名 | CHINESE GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCE
 |
| 出版日期 | 2020-12-01 |
| 卷号 | 30期号:6页码:959-975 |
| 关键词 | scientific collaboration networks spatial structure hierarchy formation mechanisms the Belt and Road regions |
| ISSN号 | 1002-0063 |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11769-020-1161-9 |
| 通讯作者 | Liu Hui(liuh@igsnrr.ac.cn) |
| 英文摘要 | Scientific collaboration has become an important part of the people-to-people exchanges in the Belt and Road initiative, and remarkable progress has been made since 2013. Taking the 65 countries along the Belt and Road (BRI countries) as the research areas and using collaborated Web of Science (WOS) core collection papers to construct an international scientific collaboration matrix, the paper explores the spatial structure, hierarchy and formation mechanisms of scientific collaboration networks of 65 countries along the Belt and Road. The results show that: 1) Beyond the Belt and Road regions (BRI regions), Central & Eastern Europe, China and West Asia & North Africa have formed a situation in which they all have the most external links with other countries beyond BRI regions. China has the dominant role over other BRI countries in generating scientific links. The overall spatial structure has changed to a skeleton structure consisting of many dense regions, such as Europe, North America, East Asia and Oceania. 2) Within the Belt and Road regions, Central & Eastern Europe has become the largest collaboration partner with other sub-regions in BRI countries. The spatial structure of scientific collaboration networks has transformed from the 'dual core' composed of China and the Central & Eastern Europe region, to the 'multi-polarization' composed of 'one zone and multi-points'. 3) The hierarchical structure of scientific collaboration networks presents a typical 'core-periphery' structure, and changes from 'single core' to 'double cores'. 4) Among the formation mechanisms of scientific collaboration networks, scientific research strength and social proximity play the most important roles, while geographical distance gradually weakens the hindrance to scientific collaboration. |
| WOS关键词 | CO-INVENTION NETWORKS ; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE ; KNOWLEDGE FLOWS ; PROXIMITY ; INNOVATION ; TECHNOLOGY ; CENTRALITY ; DYNAMICS ; POLYCENTRICITY ; DETERMINANTS |
| WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| WOS记录号 | WOS:000601571300002 |
| 出版者 | SPRINGER |
| 源URL | [http://ir.igsnrr.ac.cn/handle/311030/137184]  |
| 专题 | 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 |
| 通讯作者 | Liu Hui |
| 作者单位 | 1.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China 2.Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Reg Sustainable Dev Modeling, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China 3.Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Coll Resource & Environm, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Gu Weinan,Liu Hui. Spatial Structure, Hierarchy and Formation Mechanisms of Scientific Collaboration Networks: Evidence of the Belt and Road Regions[J]. CHINESE GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCE,2020,30(6):959-975. |
| APA | Gu Weinan,&Liu Hui.(2020).Spatial Structure, Hierarchy and Formation Mechanisms of Scientific Collaboration Networks: Evidence of the Belt and Road Regions.CHINESE GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCE,30(6),959-975. |
| MLA | Gu Weinan,et al."Spatial Structure, Hierarchy and Formation Mechanisms of Scientific Collaboration Networks: Evidence of the Belt and Road Regions".CHINESE GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCE 30.6(2020):959-975. |
入库方式： OAI收割
来源：地理科学与资源研究所
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。