Goats or pigs? Sustainable approach of different raising systems fed by maize silage
文献类型：期刊论文
| 作者 | Lyu, Yun1,2; Li, Jing1; Hou, Ruixing1; Zhu, He2,4; Zhu, Wanxue1,2; Hang, Sheng1,2; Ouyang, Zhu2,3 |
| 刊名 | JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
 |
| 出版日期 | 2020-05-01 |
| 卷号 | 254页码:12 |
| 关键词 | Ecological livestock raising system Maize silage Emergy evaluation Economic analysis Livestock carrying capacity evaluation |
| ISSN号 | 0959-6526 |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120151 |
| 通讯作者 | Ouyang, Zhu(ouyz@igsnrr.ac.cn) |
| 英文摘要 | The ecological livestock husbandry tends to be popular in China but the real situation is many models appeared without scientific analysis. And very limited theoretical researches compared ecological breeding systems and livestock species on environmental and economic and carrying capacity aspects. To choose the best pig-raising method and compare it with the goat raising system, this study combined emergy evaluation methods and economic analysis methods and livestock carrying capacity evaluation methods to gain the objective results. Pigs raising systems all performed little weaker than the goats raising system in the environment-friendly aspect. But the pigs raising systems were good at the aspects of economy and livestock carrying capacity. The 80% maize silage added fodder in the pigs fattening period (Pig-raising system Group A (PA)) performed excellently. The yield-based economic profit (Py) and profit rate (BCR) of PA increased by 2%-13% and 7 %-48%, respectively, compared to the other two pig-raising systems (Pig-raising system Group B (PB) & Group C (PC)). Meanwhile, the emergy yield ratio (EYR) and the emergy loading ratio (ELR) of PA were 0.2%-2% and 1%-3% lower than the other two systems (PB&PC), respectively. And emergy sustainability index (ESI) of PA was about 1% better than PB and PC. Furthermore, the livestock carrying capacity based on planting area (L1) and fertilized area (L2) of PA performed 18%-210% and about 14% better than PB and PC, respectively. To some extent, pigs could tolerate extreme high concentration of the maize silage added into the fodder. Moreover, a high concentration of maize silage added to the fodder of pigs did not result a sharp drop in the yield. On the contrary, the higher concentration of maize silage added to the fodder increased more economic benefits and gained more sustainability and improved the livestock carrying capacity of the ecological pigs raising system. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
| WOS关键词 | NORTH CHINA PLAIN ; NITROGEN-METABOLISM ; EMERGY ASSESSMENT ; CARCASS TRAITS ; IMPACT ; FARMS ; PERFORMANCE ; MANAGEMENT ; RESOURCES ; RESIDUES |
| 资助项目 | Chinese Academy of Sciences[XDA23050103] ; Chinese Academy of Sciences[KFJ-STS-ZDTP-049] |
| WOS研究方向 | Science & Technology - Other Topics ; Engineering ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| WOS记录号 | WOS:000518890800069 |
| 出版者 | ELSEVIER SCI LTD |
| 资助机构 | Chinese Academy of Sciences |
| 源URL | [http://ir.igsnrr.ac.cn/handle/311030/159730]  |
| 专题 | 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 |
| 通讯作者 | Ouyang, Zhu |
| 作者单位 | 1.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Ecosyst Network Observat & Modeling, Yucheng Comprehens Expt Stn, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China 2.Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China 3.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Yellow River Delta Modern Agr Engn Lab, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China 4.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Reg Sustainable Dev & Modeling, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Lyu, Yun,Li, Jing,Hou, Ruixing,et al. Goats or pigs? Sustainable approach of different raising systems fed by maize silage[J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION,2020,254:12. |
| APA | Lyu, Yun.,Li, Jing.,Hou, Ruixing.,Zhu, He.,Zhu, Wanxue.,...&Ouyang, Zhu.(2020).Goats or pigs? Sustainable approach of different raising systems fed by maize silage.JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION,254,12. |
| MLA | Lyu, Yun,et al."Goats or pigs? Sustainable approach of different raising systems fed by maize silage".JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION 254(2020):12. |
入库方式： OAI收割
来源：地理科学与资源研究所
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。