中国科学院机构知识库网格
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid
首页 机构 成果 学者
  
  1. CAS IR Grid
  2. 地理科学与资源研究所
  3. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所
Subsidy, training or material supply? The impact path of eco-compensation method on farmers & rsquo; livelihood assets

文献类型：期刊论文

作者Liu, Moucheng1; Rao, Didi1,2; Yang, Lun1; Min, Qingwen1,2
刊名JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
出版日期2021-06-01
卷号287页码:9
关键词Ecological compensation Compensation methods Sustainable livelihoods Livelihood assets Three-River-Source National Park System Pilot Area
ISSN号0301-4797
DOI10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112339
通讯作者Liu, Moucheng(liumc@igsnrr.ac.cn) ; Min, Qingwen(minqw@igsnrr.ac.cn)
英文摘要The impact of ecological compensation policies on farmers? livelihoods is related to the sustainability of policies and social equity. How do different compensation methods affect farmers? livelihood assets? This paper uses China?s Three-River-Source National Park System Pilot Area (TNP) as the research area, and designs three compensation scenarios: cash subsidy, material supply, and technical training. We evaluated the impact of different compensation methods on the livelihood assets of farmers, and reveals the impact path of ecological compensation on different livelihood assets. The results show that cash subsidies can effectively improve the livelihood assets of farmers (17.04%), the five types of livelihood capital distribution are most reasonable under technical training method (0.306); Three compensation methods have improved the human assets of rural households (40.48%, 18.57%, and 0.48% respectively) and physical assets (30.15%, 26.84%, and 9.56% respectively). It also show different effects on farmers? financial assets (44.00%,-11.43%, and 1.14%) and social assets (19.15%,-17.02%, and 10.64%, respectively). Ecological compensation reduced farmers? natural assets (32.89%), but all three compensation methods stimulated farmers to improve their education levels (59.06%, 0.79%, and 7.87%, respectively), which affected farmers? human assets; The improvement of means of production (41.54%, 50.00% and 7.69% respectively) and the family living conditions (75.00%, 25.00% and 75.00% respectively) affect the physical assets of farmers; Changes in natural assets, human assets, and physical assets affect the financial assets of farmers, while social assets is affected by financial assets and human assets.
资助项目China National key RD plan[2017YFC0506402] ; Mobility Programme DFG-NSFC[M0342]
WOS研究方向Environmental Sciences & Ecology
语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000639200600008
出版者ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
资助机构China National key RD plan ; Mobility Programme DFG-NSFC
源URL[http://ir.igsnrr.ac.cn/handle/311030/161716]  
专题中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所
通讯作者Liu, Moucheng; Min, Qingwen
作者单位1.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
2.Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714		 Liu, Moucheng,Rao, Didi,Yang, Lun,et al. Subsidy, training or material supply? The impact path of eco-compensation method on farmers & rsquo; livelihood assets[J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT,2021,287:9.
APA Liu, Moucheng,Rao, Didi,Yang, Lun,&Min, Qingwen.(2021).Subsidy, training or material supply? The impact path of eco-compensation method on farmers & rsquo; livelihood assets.JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT,287,9.
MLA Liu, Moucheng,et al."Subsidy, training or material supply? The impact path of eco-compensation method on farmers & rsquo; livelihood assets".JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 287(2021):9.

入库方式： OAI收割

来源：地理科学与资源研究所

浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本

除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。