中国科学院机构知识库网格
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid
首页 机构 成果 学者
  
  1. CAS IR Grid
  2. 地理科学与资源研究所
  3. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所
A multi-perspective composite assessment framework for prioritizing targets of sustainable development goals

文献类型：期刊论文

作者Huan, Yizhong2,3; Wang, Lingqing1,4; Burgman, Mark5; Li, Haitao4; Yu, Yurong5; Zhang, Jianpeng1,4; Liang, Tao1,4
刊名SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
出版日期2022-01-03
页码15
关键词environmental policy integrated assessment modeling network analysis SDGs interactions Southeast Asia stakeholder engagement sustainability assessment sustainable development goals
ISSN号0968-0802
DOI10.1002/sd.2283
通讯作者Liang, Tao(liangt@igsnrr.ac.cn)
英文摘要The 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and 169 targets proposed in 2015 are wide ranging and achieving them before 2030 may require extraordinarily high costs. Prioritizing a more manageable and logical sequence of SDGs targets based on national conditions is critical to reduce the complexity of SDGs, lower costs, ensure transitions are efficient, and accelerate implementation. Researchers have proposed a range of methods to rank the prioritizations of SDGs from different perspectives. Unfortunately, prioritizations of SDGs arising from different methods are not entirely consistent due to the limitations of each method. Therefore, an integrated methodological framework is required to reconcile these inconsistencies. To fill this research gap, we synthesized several methods to create a new composite assessment framework to prioritize SDGs targets. The framework consists of assessment models from three perspectives, including the impact of targets in a network composed of the interactions between targets, the gap between the targets' current and ideal performances, and the urgency of improving participation by government and society in achieving the targets. We then tested the effectiveness of this assessment framework empirically by ranking prioritizations for six targets of SDG 6 (clean water and sanitation) in Southeast Asia. Empirical results show that target 6.5 has the highest priority, followed by targets 6.4 and 6.6, while the lowest ranking target is 6.1. Finally, we outlined the advantages and limitations of each assessment method to assist stakeholders in using and broadening this composite assessment framework in the future.
WOS关键词POLICY COHERENCE ; BASE-LINES ; MODEL ; CENTRALITY ; PROGRESS ; NETWORK ; INDEX ; SDGS
资助项目Strategic Priority Research Program A of the Chinese Academy of Sciences[XDA20010301] ; State Scholarship Fund of China Scholarship Council[202004910544]
WOS研究方向Development Studies ; Science & Technology - Other Topics ; Public Administration
语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000737425800001
出版者WILEY
资助机构Strategic Priority Research Program A of the Chinese Academy of Sciences ; State Scholarship Fund of China Scholarship Council
源URL[http://ir.igsnrr.ac.cn/handle/311030/168921]  
专题中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所
通讯作者Liang, Tao
作者单位1.Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
2.Tsinghua Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
3.Tsinghua Univ, Inst Sustainable Dev Goals, Beijing, Peoples R China
4.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Land Surface Pattern & Simulat, Beijing, Peoples R China
5.Imperial Coll London, Ctr Environm Policy, London, England
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714		 Huan, Yizhong,Wang, Lingqing,Burgman, Mark,et al. A multi-perspective composite assessment framework for prioritizing targets of sustainable development goals[J]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT,2022:15.
APA Huan, Yizhong.,Wang, Lingqing.,Burgman, Mark.,Li, Haitao.,Yu, Yurong.,...&Liang, Tao.(2022).A multi-perspective composite assessment framework for prioritizing targets of sustainable development goals.SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT,15.
MLA Huan, Yizhong,et al."A multi-perspective composite assessment framework for prioritizing targets of sustainable development goals".SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (2022):15.

入库方式： OAI收割

来源：地理科学与资源研究所

浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本

除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。