Determination of Rubidium and Cesium in Chloride Type Oilfield Water byFlame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
文献类型：期刊论文
| 作者 | Li Hai-jun ; Li Wu; Ye Xiu-shen; Wu Zhi-jian
|
| 刊名 | SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS
 |
| 出版日期 | 2009 |
| 卷号 | 29期号:3页码:833-836 |
| 关键词 | Rubidium Cesium Flame atomic absorption spectrometry Oilfield water |
| ISSN号 | 1000-0593 |
| 语种 | Flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) was applied to the determination of rubidium and cesium in chloride type oilfield water by considering the interferences of the coexistent K(+), Na(+), Ca(2+), and Mg(2+) ions. Standard curve method and standard addition method were compared in the determination of rubidium and cesium in the simulated oilfield water and the real oilfield water from the Nanyishan region in Qaidam Basin. Although rubidium and cesium have similar physical-chemical properties, they present different characters during their analyses using the FAAS technique. When the standard addition method was used for the determination of rubidium, and cesium in the simulated oilfield water, the results of rubidium were very poor, whereas the results of cesium were satisfactory. When the standard curve method was used for the determination of rubidium and cesium in the simulated oilfield water, the results of both rubidium and cesium were satisfactory within the linear ranges of the standard curves. For the real oilfield water, standard addition method is also only applicable for the determination of cesium with a recovery ranging from 90% to 110%. While standard curve method is applicable for the determination of both rubidium. and cesium with a recovery ranging from 90% to 110%. Flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) was applied to the determination of rubidium and cesium in chloride type oilfield water by considering the interferences of the coexistent K(+), Na(+), Ca(2+), and Mg(2+) ions. Standard curve method and standard addition method were compared in the determination of rubidium and cesium in the simulated oilfield water and the real oilfield water from the Nanyishan region in Qaidam Basin. Although rubidium and cesium have similar physical-chemical properties, they present different characters during their analyses using the FAAS technique. When the standard addition method was used for the determination of rubidium, and cesium in the simulated oilfield water, the results of rubidium were very poor, whereas the results of cesium were satisfactory. When the standard curve method was used for the determination of rubidium and cesium in the simulated oilfield water, the results of both rubidium and cesium were satisfactory within the linear ranges of the standard curves. For the real oilfield water, standard addition method is also only applicable for the determination of cesium with a recovery ranging from 90% to 110%. While standard curve method is applicable for the determination of both rubidium. and cesium with a recovery ranging from 90% to 110%. |
| 公开日期 | 2013-10-07 |
| 源URL | [http://ir.isl.ac.cn/handle/363002/2114]  |
| 专题 | 青海盐湖研究所_青海盐湖研究所知识仓储 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Li Hai-jun,Li Wu,Ye Xiu-shen,et al. Determination of Rubidium and Cesium in Chloride Type Oilfield Water byFlame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS,2009,29(3):833-836. |
| APA | Li Hai-jun,Li Wu,Ye Xiu-shen,&Wu Zhi-jian.(2009).Determination of Rubidium and Cesium in Chloride Type Oilfield Water byFlame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry.SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS,29(3),833-836. |
| MLA | Li Hai-jun,et al."Determination of Rubidium and Cesium in Chloride Type Oilfield Water byFlame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry".SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS 29.3(2009):833-836. |
入库方式： OAI收割
来源：青海盐湖研究所
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。