中国科学院机构知识库网格
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid
Social comparisons differentially affect fair and unfair processing in ultimatum bargaining

文献类型:期刊论文

作者Li, Qi9; Dai, Weine5,6,7,8; Zheng, Ya4; Wang, Chunsheng9; Yang, Zhong3,8; Ren, Qiping2; Hu, Kesong1,2; Liu, Xun3,8
刊名NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
出版日期2022-09-09
卷号174页码:10
关键词Traditional models Comparative models Decision -making Ultimatum game MFN P300
ISSN号0028-3932
DOI10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108318
通讯作者Hu, Kesong(hkesong@gmail.com)
英文摘要Several theoretical frameworks have attempted to illustrate the influence of social contexts on decision-making and well-being. Traditional economic models assume that absolute income is the crucial determinant of one???s well-being, while the comparative models state that social comparisons influence and even determine well-being and decisions. Here we investigated the impact of social comparisons on decision-making using a modified three -player Ultimatum Game and ERP technique. We found two independent effects: First, social comparisons did not affect decision-making when a fair norm was enforced. Second, social comparisons affected fairness consideration for unfair offers only???responders were less likely to accept unfair offers in upward comparisons but more likely to accept unfair offers in downward comparisons. These results revealed that people were envy -free of fair offers while affected mainly by social comparisons when the equality norm was broken. Event-related brain potentials showed that in the early time window (260???320 ms), compared to fair offers, unfair offers elicited a larger negative-going medial frontal negativity (MFN) in upward than parallel and downward com-parisons, and in the late stage (320???650 ms), compared to fair offers, unfair offers led to equally less positive -going P300 in upward and downward comparisons relative to parallel comparison. Although partly consistent with the relative standing assumption, both traditional economic models and comparative models require revision to account for the results.
收录类别SCI
WOS关键词DECISION-MAKING ; NEURAL BASIS ; REWARD PREDICTION ; LOSS AVERSION ; NEGATIVITY ; BRAIN ; FEEDBACK ; GAME ; POTENTIALS ; INEQUALITY
WOS研究方向Behavioral Sciences ; Neurosciences & Neurology ; Psychology
语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000874773800004
出版者PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
源URL[http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/44010]  
专题心理研究所_中国科学院行为科学重点实验室
通讯作者Hu, Kesong
作者单位1.Lake Super State Univ, Dept Psychol, Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783 USA
2.Nanjing Xiaozhuang Univ, Inst Mental Hlth, Nanjing, Peoples R China
3.Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Dept Psychol, Beijing, Peoples R China
4.Dalian Med Univ, Dept Psychol, Dalian, Peoples R China
5.Sino Danish Ctr Educ & Res, Beijing, Peoples R China
6.Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sino Danish Coll, Beijing, Peoples R China
7.Aarhus Univ, CFIN & PET Ctr, DK-8200 Aarhus, NC, Denmark
8.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, CAS Key Lab Behav Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
9.Capital Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, Beijing Key Lab Learning & Cognit, Beijing, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Li, Qi,Dai, Weine,Zheng, Ya,et al. Social comparisons differentially affect fair and unfair processing in ultimatum bargaining[J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA,2022,174:10.
APA Li, Qi.,Dai, Weine.,Zheng, Ya.,Wang, Chunsheng.,Yang, Zhong.,...&Liu, Xun.(2022).Social comparisons differentially affect fair and unfair processing in ultimatum bargaining.NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA,174,10.
MLA Li, Qi,et al."Social comparisons differentially affect fair and unfair processing in ultimatum bargaining".NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA 174(2022):10.

入库方式: OAI收割

来源:心理研究所

浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。