Global meta-analysis of microplastic contamination in reservoirs with a novel framework
文献类型：期刊论文
| 作者 | Guo, Zhaofeng; Boeing, Wiebke J.; Xu, Yaoyang; Borgomeo, Edoardo; Mason, Sherri A.; Zhu, Yong-Guan |
| 刊名 | WATER RESEARCH
 |
| 出版日期 | 2021-10-01 |
| 卷号 | 3期号:11页码:- |
| 关键词 | attitude to risk biodiversity ecosystem services ordered weighted averaging spatial priorities multiple objective assessment |
| ISSN号 | 2515-7620 |
| 英文摘要 | Choosing appropriate spatial priorities for protected areas (PAs) to conserve ecosystem services (ESs) and biodiversity is a challenge for decision makers under limited land resources, especially when facing uncertain protection consequences or conflicting protection objectives. Attitudes toward risk will influence actions, which will, in turn, impact consequences. To understand how theoretical decision-makers' attitudes towards risk impact protection effectiveness for biodiversity and ESs (e.g., water retention, soil retention, flood mitigation, water purification and carbon sequestration) and how this information can be integrated into effective PAs management, we examined Hainan Island as a case study. We used the ordered weighted averaging (OWA) algorithm to assess the impact of attitude towards risk in PA management. Decision-makers' attitude towards risk scenarios (from risk-averse and risk-taking) showed higher mean protection effectiveness (2.41-2.85) than existing PAs (2.37), indicating that there is still room for improvement in biodiversity and ESs conservation in existing PAs. In addition, among the seven examined risk scenarios, the higher risk aversion scenario showed the best outcome. In comparison to existing PAs, this scenario improved mean protection effectiveness (20.13%) as well as the protection effectiveness of water retention (24.84%), water purification (11.46%), flood mitigation (8.84%), soil retention (16.63%), carbon sequestration (5.31%), and biodiversity (12.84%). Thus, our research shows that the influence of theoretical decision-makers' attitudes towards risk could be considered by OWA method which could provide a normative model of what the right choice given theoretical risk attitudes is while selecting priority area for biodiversity and ESs. |
| 源URL | [https://ir.rcees.ac.cn/handle/311016/46736]  |
| 专题 | 生态环境研究中心_城市与区域生态国家重点实验室 |
| 作者单位 | 1.[Mason, Sherri A. 2.New Mexico State Univ, Dept Fish Wildlife & Conservat Ecol, Las Cruces, NM 88003 USA 3.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Urban Environm, Key Lab Urban Environm & Hlth, Fujian Key Lab Watershed Ecol, Xiamen 361021, Peoples R China 4.Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China 5.Chinese Acad Sci, Zhejiang Key Lab Urban Environm Proc & Pollut Con, Ningbo Urban Environm Observat & Res Stn, Ningbo 315830, Peoples R China 6.Univ Oxford, Environm Change Inst, Oxford, England 7.Penn State Univ, Behrend Coll, 4701 Coll Dr, Erie, PA 16563 USA 8.Chinese Acad Sci, Res Ctr Ecoenvironm Sci, State Key Lab Urban & Reg Ecol, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Guo, Zhaofeng,Boeing, Wiebke J.,Xu, Yaoyang,et al. Global meta-analysis of microplastic contamination in reservoirs with a novel framework[J]. WATER RESEARCH,2021,3(11):-. |
| APA | Guo, Zhaofeng,Boeing, Wiebke J.,Xu, Yaoyang,Borgomeo, Edoardo,Mason, Sherri A.,&Zhu, Yong-Guan.(2021).Global meta-analysis of microplastic contamination in reservoirs with a novel framework.WATER RESEARCH,3(11),-. |
| MLA | Guo, Zhaofeng,et al."Global meta-analysis of microplastic contamination in reservoirs with a novel framework".WATER RESEARCH 3.11(2021):-. |
入库方式： OAI收割
来源：生态环境研究中心
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。