Straw checkboard or Afforestation?-Assessment and comparison of combined benefits of two typical sand fixing models
文献类型：期刊论文
| ; | |
| 作者 | Rong, Yuejing ; Yan, Yan; Zhao, Chunli; Wang, Chenxing; Shang, Xu; Zhu, Jieyuan; Li, Kai; Yang, Shanshan; Lu, Huiting; Zheng, Tianchen
|
| 刊名 | JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
 |
| 出版日期 | 2022-07-15 |
| 卷号 | 358期号:0页码:131924 |
| ISSN号 | 0959-6526 |
| 关键词 | SOIL-MOISTURE ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION LOESS PLATEAU VEGETATION DESERT EVAPOTRANSPIRATION PATTERNS IMPACTS REGION COVER |
| 英文摘要 | Land desertification and sandstorms have been affecting cities worldwide on the edge of sandstorms, so humans have been seeking for ways to strengthen their defenses against wind and sand. High water retention capacity can improve human well-being in sandy areas. Several measures and cases have been already developed. To systematically find the differences between different ecosystem restoration models according to integrated benefits (e.g., ecological, economic and social benefits), this paper proposes an effective technical methodology to quantitatively identify sand control projects in a certain area. With the Southern edge of Tengger DesertShapotou in China as an example, this paper uses land use change and NDVI change rates to identify areas of wind and sand management. In addition, this paper uses actual evaporation (ET), soil moisture (SM), temperature vegetation dryness index (TVDI) and sand fixation service to compare the advantages and disadvantages of two typical sand management models in China according to their wind and sand control benefits, resource conservation, as well as socio-economic benefits. As indicated by the results, the straw checkboard engineering model has sustainable ecological and socio-economic benefits in water retention, cost consumption, as well as wind and sand control. Besides, the afforestation model achieves higher ecological benefits in the short term, whereas it has higher operating costs and poor sustainability, which makes this model difficult in maintaining ecological stability. On the whole, both types of sand control projects show their advantages and disadvantages in wind and sand control functions, resource recycling and socio-economic benefits. Furthermore, fast-growing afforestation combined with straw checkboards is capable of sustainably resisting wind and sand attacks and preventing land desertification. Accordingly, the finding of this paper can be referenced widely for wind and sand control. |
| 源URL | [https://ir.rcees.ac.cn/handle/311016/47344]  |
| 专题 | 生态环境研究中心_城市与区域生态国家重点实验室 |
| 通讯作者 | Yan, Yan |
| 作者单位 | 1.Changjiang Inst Survey Planning Design & Res, Wuhan 430010, Peoples R China 2.Univ Copenhagen, Fac Sci, Dept Geosci & Nat Resource Management, DK-1958 Copenhagen, Denmark 3.Chinese Acad Sci, Res Ctr Ecoenvironm Sci, State Key Lab Urban & Reg Ecol, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China 4.Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China 5.Chinese Acad Sci, Aerosp Informat Res Inst, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Rong, Yuejing,Yan, Yan,Zhao, Chunli,et al. Straw checkboard or Afforestation?-Assessment and comparison of combined benefits of two typical sand fixing models, Straw checkboard or Afforestation_—Assessment and comparison of combined benefits of two typical sand fixing models.pdf[J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION,2022,358(0):131924. |
| APA | Rong, Yuejing.,Yan, Yan.,Zhao, Chunli.,Wang, Chenxing.,Shang, Xu.,...&Zheng, Lifu.(2022).Straw checkboard or Afforestation?-Assessment and comparison of combined benefits of two typical sand fixing models.JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION,358(0),131924. |
| MLA | Rong, Yuejing,et al."Straw checkboard or Afforestation?-Assessment and comparison of combined benefits of two typical sand fixing models".JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION 358.0(2022):131924. |
入库方式： OAI收割
来源：生态环境研究中心
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。