Systematic and bibliographic review of sustainability indicators for contaminated site remediation: Comparison between China and western nations
文献类型:期刊论文
作者 | Li, Xiaonuo; Cundy, Andrew B.; Chen, Weiping![]() |
刊名 | ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
![]() |
出版日期 | 2021-09 |
卷号 | 200页码:- |
关键词 | Sustainable remediation Co-occurrence analysis Social network analysis Contaminated site management Evaluation indicator |
ISSN号 | 0013-9351 |
英文摘要 | Sustainable remediation, which promotes the use of more sustainable practices during environmental clean-up activities, is an area of intense international development. While numerous indicators related to sustainable remediation assessment have been utilized and published in related academic literature, they are difficult to unify and vary in emphasis between countries. Following literature retrieval from CNKI, Springer, ScienceDirect, and Wiley Online databases, we present a systematic and bibliometric analysis of relevant national and international literature to define the most frequently considered indicators of sustainability, which play important roles in selecting remediation technologies or site management methods from a sustainability perspective. Following the application of co-occurrence analysis and social network analysis, the results indicate that 1) environmental criteria are most commonly used in evaluating remediation technologies, with significantly less emphasis on social criteria in Chinese publications in particular; 2) with an increasing number of publications in the last 20 years, sustainable remediation has gone through an initial stage, rising stage, and burst or wider adoption stage, characterized by a transformation of the research theme from a predominantly risk-based management approach to a sustainability-based one, with risk management as an underpinning principle; 3) health, resource, cost, and time are the most widely used indicators in terms of social, environmental, economic, and technical criteria, respectively; 4) clear differences exist between China and other nations, particularly in the frequency of usage of each indicator, the application of social criteria, and preferred stakeholders. Nevertheless, China has made significant progress and now makes increasing contributions to sustainable remediation at an international level. |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences ; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health |
源URL | [http://ir.rcees.ac.cn/handle/311016/46091] ![]() |
专题 | 生态环境研究中心_土壤环境科学实验室 |
作者单位 | 1.Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Coll Resource & Environm, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China 2.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Ecosyst Network Observat & Modeling, Beijing 100101, Peop 3.Univ Southampton, Sch Ocean & Earth Sci, Southampton SO14 3ZH, Hants, England 4.Chinese Acad Sci, Res Ctr Ecoenvironm Sci, Lab Soil Environm Sci & Technol, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Li, Xiaonuo,Cundy, Andrew B.,Chen, Weiping,et al. Systematic and bibliographic review of sustainability indicators for contaminated site remediation: Comparison between China and western nations[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH,2021,200:-. |
APA | Li, Xiaonuo,Cundy, Andrew B.,Chen, Weiping,&Lyu, Sidan.(2021).Systematic and bibliographic review of sustainability indicators for contaminated site remediation: Comparison between China and western nations.ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH,200,-. |
MLA | Li, Xiaonuo,et al."Systematic and bibliographic review of sustainability indicators for contaminated site remediation: Comparison between China and western nations".ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 200(2021):-. |
入库方式: OAI收割
来源:生态环境研究中心
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。