Soil carbon sequestration benefits of active versus natural restoration vary with initial carbon content and soil layer
文献类型：期刊论文
| 作者 | Tian, Dashuan4; Xiang, Yangzhou3; Seabloom, Eric2; Wang, Jinsong4; Jia, Xiaoxu4; Li, Tingting4; Li, Zhaolei1; Yang, Jian6; Guo, Hongbo; Niu, Shuli4 |
| 刊名 | COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT
 |
| 出版日期 | 2023-03-17 |
| 卷号 | 4期号:1页码:83 |
| DOI | 10.1038/s43247-023-00737-1 |
| 文献子类 | Article |
| 英文摘要 | Active restoration of croplands more strongly enhances soil carbon relative to natural regeneration in carbon-poor soils and topsoil layers, while natural regeneration performs better in carbon-rich soils and subsoil layers, suggests a large-scale paired comparison of two restoration strategies. Reducing terrestrial carbon emissions is a big challenge for human societies. Ecosystem restoration is predominant to reverse land degradation and carbon loss. Though active restoration of croplands is assumed to increase carbon sequestration more than natural regeneration, it still lacks the robust paired comparisons between them. Here we performed a large-scale paired comparison of active versus natural restoration effects on soil carbon sequestration across China. We found that two restoration strategies consistently enhanced soil carbon relative to croplands, however, the benefits of active restoration versus natural regeneration were highly context-dependent. Active restoration only sequestered more carbon in carbon-poor soils but less carbon in carbon-rich soils than natural regeneration. Moreover, active restoration fixed greater carbon in topsoil but less carbon in subsoil. Overall, these findings highlight landscape context-dependent application of active restoration and natural regeneration, further guiding the efficient management of limited resources to maximize the restoration benefits of carbon sequestration. |
| WOS关键词 | TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS ; ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION ; FOREST RESTORATION ; CHINA GRAIN ; METAANALYSIS ; DIVERSITY ; PRODUCTIVITY ; BIODIVERSITY ; ENHANCEMENT ; DEPTH |
| WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Geology ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
| WOS记录号 | WOS:000952278400001 |
| 出版者 | SPRINGERNATURE |
| 源URL | [http://ir.igsnrr.ac.cn/handle/311030/190480]  |
| 专题 | 生态系统网络观测与模拟院重点实验室_外文论文 |
| 作者单位 | 1.Univ MN, Dept Ecol Evolut & Behav, St Paul, MN 55108 USA 2.Guizhou Educ Univ, Guizhou Prov Key Lab Geog State Monitoring Watersh, Guiyang 550018, Peoples R China 3.Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Coll Resources & Environm, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China 4.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Ecosyst Network Observat & Modeling, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China 5.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Bot, State Key Lab Systemat & Evolutionary Bot, Beijing 100093, Peoples R China 6.Shandong Agr Univ, Coll Resources & Environm, Tai An 271018, Peoples R China |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Tian, Dashuan,Xiang, Yangzhou,Seabloom, Eric,et al. Soil carbon sequestration benefits of active versus natural restoration vary with initial carbon content and soil layer[J]. COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT,2023,4(1):83. |
| APA | Tian, Dashuan.,Xiang, Yangzhou.,Seabloom, Eric.,Wang, Jinsong.,Jia, Xiaoxu.,...&Niu, Shuli.(2023).Soil carbon sequestration benefits of active versus natural restoration vary with initial carbon content and soil layer.COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT,4(1),83. |
| MLA | Tian, Dashuan,et al."Soil carbon sequestration benefits of active versus natural restoration vary with initial carbon content and soil layer".COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT 4.1(2023):83. |
入库方式： OAI收割
来源：地理科学与资源研究所
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。