Comparison of logistic regression and machine learning methods for predicting postoperative delirium in elderly patients: A retrospective study
文献类型:期刊论文
作者 | Song, Yu-Xiang2,3; Yang, Xiao-Dong1; Luo, Yun-Gen2,3; Ouyang, Chun-Lei3; Yu, Yao3; Ma, Yu-Long3; Li, Hao3; Lou, Jing-Sheng3; Liu, Yan-Hong3; Chen, Yi-Qiang1 |
刊名 | CNS NEUROSCIENCE & THERAPEUTICS
![]() |
出版日期 | 2022-10-11 |
页码 | 10 |
关键词 | aged delirium machine learning nomograms risk assessment |
ISSN号 | 1755-5930 |
DOI | 10.1111/cns.13991 |
英文摘要 | Aims To compare the performance of logistic regression and machine learning methods in predicting postoperative delirium (POD) in elderly patients. Method This was a retrospective study of perioperative medical data from patients undergoing non-cardiac and non-neurology surgery over 65 years old from January 2014 to August 2019. Forty-six perioperative variables were used to predict POD. A traditional logistic regression and five machine learning models (Random Forest, GBM, AdaBoost, XGBoost, and a stacking ensemble model) were compared by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), sensitivity, specificity, and precision. Results In total, 29,756 patients were enrolled, and the incidence of POD was 3.22% after variable screening. AUCs were 0.783 (0.765-0.8) for the logistic regression method, 0.78 for random forest, 0.76 for GBM, 0.74 for AdaBoost, 0.73 for XGBoost, and 0.77 for the stacking ensemble model. The respective sensitivities for the 6 aforementioned models were 74.2%, 72.2%, 76.8%, 63.6%, 71.6%, and 67.4%. The respective specificities for the 6 aforementioned models were 70.7%, 99.8%, 96.5%, 98.8%, 96.5%, and 96.1%. The respective precision values for the 6 aforementioned models were 7.8%, 52.3%, 55.6%, 57%, 54.5%, and 56.4%. Conclusions The optimal application of the logistic regression model could provide quick and convenient POD risk identification to help improve the perioperative management of surgical patients because of its better sensitivity, fewer variables, and easier interpretability than the machine learning model. |
资助项目 | National Key Research and Development Program of China[2018YFC2001901] |
WOS研究方向 | Neurosciences & Neurology ; Pharmacology & Pharmacy |
语种 | 英语 |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000865651300001 |
出版者 | WILEY |
源URL | [http://119.78.100.204/handle/2XEOYT63/19802] ![]() |
专题 | 中国科学院计算技术研究所期刊论文 |
通讯作者 | Chen, Yi-Qiang; Cao, Jiang-Bei; Mi, Wei-Dong |
作者单位 | 1.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Comp Technol, 6 Kexueyuan South Rd, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China 2.Chinese Peoples Liberat Army, Med Sch, Beijing, Peoples R China 3.Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Med Ctr 1, 28 Fuxing Rd, Beijing 100853, Peoples R China |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Song, Yu-Xiang,Yang, Xiao-Dong,Luo, Yun-Gen,et al. Comparison of logistic regression and machine learning methods for predicting postoperative delirium in elderly patients: A retrospective study[J]. CNS NEUROSCIENCE & THERAPEUTICS,2022:10. |
APA | Song, Yu-Xiang.,Yang, Xiao-Dong.,Luo, Yun-Gen.,Ouyang, Chun-Lei.,Yu, Yao.,...&Mi, Wei-Dong.(2022).Comparison of logistic regression and machine learning methods for predicting postoperative delirium in elderly patients: A retrospective study.CNS NEUROSCIENCE & THERAPEUTICS,10. |
MLA | Song, Yu-Xiang,et al."Comparison of logistic regression and machine learning methods for predicting postoperative delirium in elderly patients: A retrospective study".CNS NEUROSCIENCE & THERAPEUTICS (2022):10. |
入库方式: OAI收割
来源:计算技术研究所
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。