可回收垃圾宜用绿色而非蓝色标注
文献类型：学位论文
| 作者 | 崔凯丽 |
| 答辩日期 | 2021-12 |
| 文献子类 | 继续教育硕士 |
| 授予单位 | 中国科学院大学 |
| 授予地点 | 中国科学院心理研究所 |
| 其他责任者 | 王鹏云 |
| 关键词 | 垃圾分类 可回收垃圾桶 颜色 绿色 蓝色 |
| 学位名称 | 理学硕士 |
| 学位专业 | 健康心理学 |
| 其他题名 | Recyclable waste should be marked green rather than blue |
| 中文摘要 | Object: At present, the major cities that have introduced waste separation policies in China all use "blue" to correspond to recyclable garbage cans instead of "green", which is inconsistent with the traditional concept of "green" environmental protection, "green" recyclable and "green" recycling. This is inconsistent with the traditional concepts of "green" environmental protection, "green" recyclable, and "green" recycling. The purpose of this study is to explore whether green is a more appropriate color for recycling bins or signs than blue, and thus can improve the efficiency of sorting and placing recyclable waste; whether the reason behind this is because of the closer semantic relationship between green and the concept of "recyclable".Method: This thesis consists of two studies. Study 1 examined which color was more appropriate for the recyclable bin and the recyclable bin logo, green or blue, and the differences between genders and ages in the experiment through four simulated waste sorting experiments. Study 2 firstly, used a self-designed questionnaire to measure the external attitudes to examine which color people subjectively felt was more appropriate for the recycling bin, and secondly, used the IAT implicit attitudes test to verify which color, green or blue, was more closely associated with the concept of "recyclable bin".Results: Study 1 found that: (1) When the recyclable bin is green, it is better for the middle-aged and elderly people to perform proper waste separation. (2) For all groups, gray garbage cans with green recyclable signs were faster and better than blue ones. (3) All subjects took significantly less time to put out garbage for the green recyclable bin group than for the blue recyclable bin group, and the correct garbage placement rate for the green recyclable bin group was significantly higher than the correct garbage placement rate for the blue recyclable bin group for the middle-aged and elderly groups. (4) No significant effect of gender on the relationship between color and garbage sorting was found. Study 2 found that: (1) The percentage of people who agreed with green as the color of the recyclable trash can was significantly higher than that of blue. (2) The implicit association test did not find a stronger implicit semantic association between green and the concept of "recyclable" than blue.Conclusion: This thesis demonstrates that green is a more appropriate color for recycling bins or signs than blue among the youth and middle-aged groups in Beijing represented by the sample of this study; this advantage may come mainly from the explicit association between green and the concept of "recyclable". This study has theoretical implications for the effective implementation of waste separation policies in China. |
| 英文摘要 | 目的： 目前在国内出台垃圾分类政策的主要城市，都以“蓝色”对应可回收垃圾桶，而不是 “绿色”，这与传统的“绿色”环保、“绿色”可回收、“绿色”循环利用观念不一致。本研究旨在探索绿色相对比蓝色，是否更合适作为可回收垃圾桶或者标识的颜色，从而可以提高可回收垃圾分类投放的效率；背后的原因是不是因为绿色和“可回收”概念的语义关系更紧密。方法：本论文包含两个研究。研究一通过四个模拟垃圾分类投放实验，考察了绿色和蓝色哪种更合适作为可回收垃圾桶和可回收垃圾桶标识的颜色，以及考察了不同性别和年龄在实验中的差异。研究二首先通过自行设计的问卷，测量外显态度，考察人们主观觉得哪种颜色更适合做可回收垃圾桶的颜色；其次通过IAT内隐态度测试，验证绿色和蓝色哪个颜色和“可回收垃圾桶”的概念更为联系紧密。结果：研究一发现：（1）可回收垃圾桶为绿色时，更有利于中老年人群执行正确的垃圾分类。（2）对所有人群来说，灰色垃圾桶贴上绿色可回收标识，要比贴蓝色标识，投放的又快又好。（3）所有被试对于绿色可回收垃圾桶组的垃圾投放的时间都要显著低于蓝色可回收垃圾桶组垃圾投放时间，中老年组的绿色可回收垃圾桶组的垃圾投放正确率要显著高于蓝色可回收垃圾桶组垃圾投放正确率。（4）未发现性别对颜色和垃圾分类的关系有显著影响。研究二发现：（1）人们对将绿色作为可回收垃圾桶颜色的认同比例显著高于蓝色。（2）内隐联想测验未发现绿色比蓝色同“可回收”概念有更强的内隐语义联系。结论：本论文证明在本研究被试样本所能代表的北京青年和中老年群体中，绿色比蓝色更适合作为可回收垃圾桶或者标识的颜色；这种优势可能主要来自绿色和“可回收”概念的外显关联。本研究对国内垃圾分类政策的有效实施有理论指导意义。 |
| 语种 | 中文 |
| 源URL | [http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/45279]  |
| 专题 | 心理研究所_健康与遗传心理学研究室 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | 崔凯丽. 可回收垃圾宜用绿色而非蓝色标注[D]. 中国科学院心理研究所. 中国科学院大学. 2021. |
入库方式： OAI收割
来源：心理研究所
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。