Development Trends in Soil Erosion Fields Based on the Quantitative Evaluation of Innovation Subjects and Innovation Content from 1991 to 2020
文献类型：期刊论文
| 作者 | Zhai, Lihua1; Sun, Liying2,3; Zhang, Yihui2,3 |
| 刊名 | SUSTAINABILITY
 |
| 出版日期 | 2024 |
| 卷号 | 16期号:2页码:15 |
| 关键词 | innovation subject comprehensive innovation strength scale evolution bibliometric analysis |
| DOI | 10.3390/su16020795 |
| 通讯作者 | Sun, Liying(sunliying@igsnrr.ac.cn) |
| 英文摘要 | This paper mainly quantitatively analyzes papers in the field of soil erosion from an objective evaluation perspective. The purpose is to provide researchers in the field of soil and water conservation with a comprehensive understanding of the field. The bibliometric method was used to evaluate the technological innovation and evolution characteristics of soil erosion research. In terms of research scale, China and the United States have an absolute lead in this field. China started late, but the growth rate is faster. The evolution process of soil erosion research is classified into three stages (1991-2000, 2001-2010, and 2011-2020). In terms of innovation subjects (countries and institutions) in soil erosion fields, dominant countries exhibit more concentrated results, with an increase from 57% to 80% with respect to the ratio of the number of output papers in these countries to the total number of output papers in the research field of soil erosion. In contrast, research institutions are increasingly divergent, with a decrease from 36% to 26% with respect to the ratio of the number of output papers in the dominant institutions to the total number of output papers in the research field. The comparison results of the comprehensive innovation strength of major countries indicate that soil erosion research has experienced processes such as domination by the United States, and other countries have caught up via concerted efforts, with China and the USA finally leading comprehensively. The overall leading ability of China and the United States in soil erosion research continues to converge and improve. Belgium and other European countries have small research scale characteristics but greater influence capacities. The study of erosion mechanisms and erosion modelling has always been the main research direction in this field, while the quantitative study of soil erosion on large scales and its effects on element cycling comprises the current main research stream and development trend. The results of the present study could provide scientific support for a better understanding of the evolution of innovation characteristics in the field of soil erosion. |
| WOS关键词 | BLUE NILE BASIN ; LOESS PLATEAU ; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT ; LAND-USE ; IMPACT ; RUNOFF ; CLIMATE ; CONSERVATION ; PRODUCTIVITY ; BIODIVERSITY |
| 资助项目 | National Natural Science Foundation of China |
| WOS研究方向 | Science & Technology - Other Topics ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 出版者 | MDPI |
| WOS记录号 | WOS:001151444500001 |
| 资助机构 | National Natural Science Foundation of China |
| 源URL | [http://ir.igsnrr.ac.cn/handle/311030/202354]  |
| 专题 | 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 |
| 通讯作者 | Sun, Liying |
| 作者单位 | 1.Inst Sci & Tech Informat China, Beijing 100038, Peoples R China 2.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Water Cycle & Related Land Surface Proc, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China 3.Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Coll Resources & Environm, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Zhai, Lihua,Sun, Liying,Zhang, Yihui. Development Trends in Soil Erosion Fields Based on the Quantitative Evaluation of Innovation Subjects and Innovation Content from 1991 to 2020[J]. SUSTAINABILITY,2024,16(2):15. |
| APA | Zhai, Lihua,Sun, Liying,&Zhang, Yihui.(2024).Development Trends in Soil Erosion Fields Based on the Quantitative Evaluation of Innovation Subjects and Innovation Content from 1991 to 2020.SUSTAINABILITY,16(2),15. |
| MLA | Zhai, Lihua,et al."Development Trends in Soil Erosion Fields Based on the Quantitative Evaluation of Innovation Subjects and Innovation Content from 1991 to 2020".SUSTAINABILITY 16.2(2024):15. |
入库方式： OAI收割
来源：地理科学与资源研究所
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。