Objective To explore the status of adult attachment and its relationship with cognitions, emotions, behaviors, and personal relationship of undergraduate from rural areas with left-behind experience（URLB）. Methods This study investigated 4271 rural college students through questionnaires（ Experiences in Close Rela- tionships Inventory Questionnaire, Simplified Coping Style,the Self-Esteem Scale, Center for Epidimiologic Studies Depression Scale, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and College Student＇ s Personal Relationship Synthetical Diagnostic Scale） , and 1062 URLB were screened. Results 1. URLB have significant difference from those without in attachment avoidance, anxiety,depression, active coping style, self-esteem, and personal relationship（ t = 2. 970, 8. 063,2.192,1. 969, - 6. 605, - 2.913,4.065 respectively, P 〈 0.05 ）. 2. URLB with higher aduh attachment avoidance showed obvious interpersonal difficulties （ t = -3. 415, P 〈 0.01 ） ; those with higher attachment anxiety showed dramatic rise in depression, state anxiety, trait anxiety and interpersonal difficulties （ t=7. 436,7. 961, 10.131,2. 633,6. 764,10. 598 respectively, all P 〈 0.01 ）. Conclusion The psychological behavior features of URLB were affected by adult attachment. There are needed appropriate psychological interventions to URLB with high attachment avoidence and high attachment anxiety.

目的 探讨农村留守经历大学生（URLB）的成人依恋状况以及不同的成人依恋状况在认知、情绪、行为以及人际关系上的表现.方法 采用亲密关系体验问卷、简易应对方式问卷、自尊量表、流调中心用抑郁量表、状态-特质焦虑问卷和大学生人际关系综合诊断量表对河北省2所高校4271名农村生源在校大学生调查,筛选出儿童期有留守经历的大学生1062名.结果 1.URLB与非URLB比较,在依恋回避维度上的得分高于非URLB,差异具有显著性[（4.15±0.53）分,（4.09±0.53）分,t=2.970,P＜0.05）;在抑郁、状态焦虑、特质焦虑、积极应对方式、自尊以及人际关系上两者均存在显著性差异（t值依次为8.063,2.192,1.969,-6.605,-2.913,4.065,均P＜0.05））.2.URLB高依恋回避者与低依恋回避者比较,在人际关系评分方面两者存在显著性差异（t=3.415,P＜0.01）,而在抑郁、状态焦虑、特质焦虑、应对方式、自尊水平上均没有显著性差异;URLB高依恋焦虑者与低依恋焦虑者比较,在上述各因子上均差异有显著性（t值依次为7.436,7.961,10.131,2.633,6.764,10.598,均P＜0.01）.结论 URLB的依恋状况影响其心理行为的表现,需要对高依恋回避者和高依恋焦虑者进行适当的心理干预.

中国西部之光项目；河北省教育厅课题(S090901)