创造过程信念量表的开发及其对人员选择的影响
文献类型：学位论文
| 作者 | 孙文 |
| 答辩日期 | 2024-06 |
| 文献子类 | 硕士 |
| 授予单位 | 中国科学院大学 |
| 授予地点 | 中国科学院心理研究所 |
| 其他责任者 | 白新文 |
| 关键词 | 创造力 内隐理论 创造过程信念 顿悟观 生成观 |
| 学位名称 | 应用心理硕士 |
| 学位专业 | 应用心理 |
| 其他题名 | Creative Process Beliefs: Scale Development and Effects on Personnel Selection |
| 中文摘要 | Implicit theory, also known as naïve theory or implicit belief, refers to people's basic understanding of the nature and operation of people, things, and phenomena in the world and their surroundings based on common sense, intuition, or personal experience. People also form their own implicit beliefs about how ideas are generated, i.e., beliefs about the creative process. Previous research on beliefs about the creative process has focused on what behaviors and ways contribute to the generation of ideas. Lucas and Mai's (2022) latest theories suggest that people's naïve understanding of where ideas come from is central to their beliefs about the creative process. The theory holds that there are two contrasting implicit views: the epiphany view and the generative view. Epiphany people often believe that a high level of creativity comes from epiphany and unexpected inspiration, that it is not transferred by personal will, and that it cannot be predicted or planned in advance. Those who hold the view of life advocate that high-level creativity comes from systematic conception and positive action, and is the product of personal systematic analysis, in-depth thinking, gradual advancement, and continuous improvement. However, the theory is still in the research conception stage, and it lacks the scales that meet the requirements of reliability and validity, which is not conducive to empirical research. In addition, the existing studies mainly focus on how beliefs in the creative process affect individual creativity and innovation output, while relatively ignoring how implicit beliefs about creativity affect cooperative innovation. As the requirements of creative tasks become more complex, teams have become the basic unit for engaging in creative tasks. How to choose the right teammates to form a team and carry out collaborative innovation is very important. In view of this, this study first developed a measurement scale for epiphany and generative belief based on the latest theory of Lucas and Mai (2022) belief in the creation process and tested their reliability and validity. The developed measurement scale was used to explore the influence of people's epiphany or generative perception on people's choice of cooperative innovation partners, and further revealed the internal mechanism of belief in the creative process affecting partner choice. In this study, two studies were conducted to explore the above questions, respectively. In the development of the test scale in study 1, the compilation and reliability and validity of the scale were carried out through six sub-studies, such as the compilation of the test scale, the structure of factors, the validity of aggregation and discrimination, the reliability of test-retest, the validity of the surface, the relationship between individual differences and beliefs in the creative process, and the results showed that the test scales on epiphany and generative view developed in this study met the requirements of various reliability and validity indicators of psychometric measures. Ability to adequately and effectively measure the individual's beliefs about the creative process.Study 2 explores how beliefs in the creative process affect the selection of co-innovation partners through two studies. Study 2a preliminarily verified the predictive effect of belief in the creation process on personnel choice through correlation test and binary logistic regression, and the results showed that people with epiphany view were more willing to choose candidates with the same epiphany beliefs when choosing work partners, and those with life view were also more willing to choose candidates with the same beliefs as themselves. Study 2b explores the influence of creative process beliefs on personnel selection and the possible mediating mechanisms, and the results show that matching factors such as person-job matching, person-team matching, and subordinate-leader matching are the mediating variables of creative process beliefs predicting personnel selection, and people have a higher evaluation of candidates with the same beliefs as themselves, so they are more likely to choose candidates with the same beliefs as themselves. This study provides a measurement tool that meets the requirements of reliability and validity for the follow-up empirical study of creation process beliefs. Further research also shows that the implicit creativity beliefs held by individuals also affect how people engage in collaborative innovation, which provides new ideas for followup research. |
| 英文摘要 | 内隐理论又称朴素理论或内隐信念，指的是人们基于常识、直觉或个人经 验形成的对世界和周围环境中的人、事物和现象的本质和运作的基本理解。人 们对于创意是如何产生的也会形成各自的内隐信念，即创造过程信念。以往关 于创造过程信念的研究主要围绕人们对哪些行为和方式有利于创意产生所展 开。Lucas 和 Mai (2022)最新的理论提出，人们对创意从何而来的朴素理解，是 其所持有的创造过程信念的核心。该理论认为，存在顿悟观和生成观两种相互 对比的内隐观。持顿悟观的人通常认为，高水平创意来源于顿悟和不期而至的 灵感，不以个人意志而转移，无法预测或提前规划。而持生成观的人则主张， 高水平创意来源于系统构思和积极行动，是个人系统分析、深入思考、逐步推 进、持续完善的产物。然而，该理论尚处于研究构想阶段，缺乏符合信效度要 求的生成观和顿悟观测量量表，不利于开展实证研究。此外，已有研究主要关 注创造过程信念如何影响个体的创造力和创新产出，而相对忽略创造力内隐信 念如何影响合作创新的。随着创造任务的要求越来越复杂，团队已成为从事创 造性任务的基本单元。如何选择合适队友组成团队开展合作创新非常关键。 鉴于此，本研究首先基于 Lucas 和 Mai (2022)创造过程信念的最新理论， 开发顿悟观和生成观的测量量表和检验其信度和效度。采用所开发的测量量 表，探讨人们的顿悟观或生成观对人们选择合作创新伙伴的影响，并进一步揭 示创造过程信念影响合作伙伴选择的内在机制。 本研究开展了两个研究分别探讨上述问题。研究一测验量表的开发，通过6 个子研究进行测验量表的编制、因素结构、聚合与区分效度、重测信度、表 面效度、个体差异与创造过程信念的关系等方面开展量表编制与信效度的检 验，通过专家评审、探索性与验证性因素分析等方法，结果表明本研究所开发 的关于顿悟观和生成观的测验量表符合心理测量各项信效度指标要求，能够充 分且有效地测量个体所持有的创造过程信念。 研究二通过两项子研究，探讨创造过程信念 如何影响合作创新伙伴的人员 甄选。研究 2a 获得 119 人的调查数据，通过相关性检验及二元 logistic 回归初 步验证了创造过程信念对人员选择的预测作用。结果表明，个体倾向于选择和 自己持同样信念的伙伴开展合作创新。具体而言，持顿悟观的人更愿意选择同 样持顿悟观信念的候选人，而持生成观的人也是更愿意选择持与自身相同信念 的候选人。基于 240 人的调查数据，研究 2b 交叉检验创造过程信念对人员甄选 的影响，并进一步揭示其中介机制。回归分析结果表明，人职匹配、团队匹配 和下属-领导匹配等匹配因素是创造过程信念影响人员选择的中介变量。具体而 言，人们对持与自身相同信念的候选人的评价更高，因而更有可能选择持与自 身相同信念的人作为合作创新伙伴。 本研究为创造过程信念的后续实证研究提供了符合信度和效度要求的测量 工具。进一步研究还表明，个体所持有的内隐创造力信念还会影响人们如何投 入合作创新，为后续研究提供了新思路。 |
| 语种 | 中文 |
| 源URL | [http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/48150]  |
| 专题 | 心理研究所_社会与工程心理学研究室 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | 孙文. 创造过程信念量表的开发及其对人员选择的影响[D]. 中国科学院心理研究所. 中国科学院大学. 2024. |
入库方式： OAI收割
来源：心理研究所
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。