造纸业内外勤员工新冠疫情风险感知与心理健康状态的关系研究
文献类型：学位论文
| 作者 | 高 丽 |
| 答辩日期 | 2023-12 |
| 文献子类 | 继续教育硕士 |
| 授予单位 | 中国科学院大学 |
| 授予地点 | 中国科学院心理研究所 |
| 其他责任者 | 高文斌 |
| 关键词 | 新型冠状病毒 内外勤 心理健康状态 风险易感性感知 频次 |
| 学位名称 | 理学硕士 |
| 学位专业 | 健康心理学 |
| 其他题名 | Study on the relationship between COVID-19 risk perception and mental health status of back-office and field employees in papermaking industry |
| 中文摘要 | As a major public health event, the risk pressure caused by the novel coronavirus pneumonia epidemic has brought adverse effects on people's physical and mental health. The study found that in the early stage of the outbreak of COVID-19, people's assessment of the severity of mental health conditions such as anxiety and depression of residents in the epidemic area was higher than that of residents in the epidemic area, based on the perspective of onlookers, which showed a "psychological typhoon eye effect". However, based on the perspective of the parties concerned, the risk perception and mental health status of people in different levels of epidemic areas showed a similar "ripple effect" trend, and the severely affected areas were larger than other areas. This study will examine the "ripple effect" of epidemic risk exposure frequency on people's risk perception and mental health status from the perspective of the parties concerned. Two parts were included. The first part examined the impact of differences in backoffice and field tasks (differences in epidemic risk exposure frequency) on risk perception and mental health status of employees in papermaking and related industries during the period of COVID-19 epidemic control. In the second part, the frequency of epidemic risk exposure was systematically manipulated to further verify the formation mechanism of "ripple effect". In the first part, 783 valid samples were obtained by questionnaire survey of employees in papermaking and related industries. It was found that employees in papermaking and related industries had significant differences in risk susceptibility perception scores in back-office and field tasks, and employees with more field tasks were significantly higher than those with more internal tasks. However, there was no significant difference in the scores of somatization, depression and anxiety between back-office and field tasks. The higher the frequency of business trips, the higher the frequency of epidemic risk exposure, and the "ripple effect" of exposure frequency is mainly reflected in risk perception. Back-office and field tasks were grouped according to the frequency of field task and the mediating effect test was carried out. It was found that back-office field task mediated the level of somatization, depression and anxiety of employees through the perception of risk susceptibility. In part two, the frequency of epidemic risk exposure was systematically manipulated through experimental design, and 157 employees in papermaking and related industries were recruited as subjects, which constituted 3 (risk perception task: high epidemic risk exposure task, low epidemic risk exposure task, non-epidemic risk exposure task) ×3 (risk perception task frequency: high frequency, middle frequency, low frequency) hybrid designs, to further verify the influence mechanism of epidemic risk exposure frequency on risk perception. Firstly, task design was carried out based on the experience of the subjects during the epidemic from the perspective of the parties concerned. The epidemic and non-epidemic information in the risk perception task is compiled based on the events or scenarios during the epidemic period. The exposure frequency of epidemic risk and non-epidemic risk is presented by the occurrence frequency. Secondly, the presentation order of risk perception tasks and different representation of the same frequency information (size and scale representation) are balanced. The results showed that under different frequency conditions, the participants' perception and evaluation of the risk of COVID-19 were significantly different, which verified the findings in part one. In summary, back-office and field task of employees in papermaking and related industries mediates their mental health status through their risk susceptibility of COVID-19. The higher the frequency of risk exposure to COVID-19, the higher the risk perception, resulting in a "ripple effect". This finding provides a new perspective and response strategy for epidemic risk prevention and control. |
| 英文摘要 | 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情，作为一个重大公共卫生事件所形成的风险压力对民众的身心健康带来不利影响。研究发现，在新冠肺炎疫情发生初期，基于旁观者视角，民众对疫区居民焦虑、抑郁等心理健康状态严重程度的评估高于疫区居民自身的评估，存在"心理台风眼效应"；但基于当事人视角时，不同程度疫情地区民众的风险感知和心理健康状态存在类似"涟漪效应"的趋势，疫情严重地区大于其他地区。本研究将基于当事人视角，考察疫情风险暴露频次在民众风险感知和心理健康状态上的"涟漪效应"。包括两项研究，研究一考察新冠肺炎疫情管控期间，造纸及关联行业员工内外勤任务差异（疫情风险暴露频次差异）在风险感知及心理健康状态上的影响；研究二对疫情风险暴露频次进行系统操纵，进一步验 证"涟漪效应"的形成机制。 研究一选取全国造纸及关联行业在职员工为研究对象进行问卷调查，获得有效样本 783 份。发现造纸及关联行业员工新冠肺炎疫情风险易感性感知得分在内外勤任务上差异显著，外勤任务多的员工显著高于内勤任务多的员工。但员工的躯体化、抑郁和焦虑水平得分在内外勤任务员工中无显著差异。出差频次越高，疫情风险暴露频次越高，暴露频次的"涟漪效应"主要体现在风险感知上。以外勤任务的频次对内外勤人员进行分组并进行中介效应检验，发现内外勤任务通过风险易感性感知中介了员工的躯体化、抑郁和焦虑水平。 研究二通过实验设计，对疫情风险暴露频次进行系统操纵，招募造纸及关联行业在职员工 157人为被试，构成 3（风险感知任务：高疫情风险暴露任务，低 疫情风险暴露任务，非疫情风险暴露任务）×3（风险感知任务频次：高频、中 频、低频）混合设计，以进一步验证疫情风险暴露频次对风险感知的影响机制。首先，基于当事人视角，以被试在疫情期间的经历为基础进行任务设计。风险感知任务中的疫情和非疫情信息均以疫情期间的事件或场景为依据进行任务编制， 疫情风险和非疫情风险的暴露频次通过发生频次的大小进行呈现。其次，对风险感知任务的呈现顺序、同一频次信息的不同表征方式（大小尺度表征）进行了平 衡。结果发现，不同频次条件下，被试对新冠肺炎疫情风险的感知评价差异显著，验证了研究一中的发现。 综上，造纸及关联行业员工的内外勤任务通过新冠肺炎疫情风险易感性中介了心理健康状态。新冠肺炎疫情风险暴露频次越高，风险感知越高，出现"涟漪 效应"。这一发现为疫情风险防控提供了新的视角和应对策略。 |
| 语种 | 中文 |
| 源URL | [http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/48227]  |
| 专题 | 心理研究所_健康与遗传心理学研究室 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | 高 丽. 造纸业内外勤员工新冠疫情风险感知与心理健康状态的关系研究[D]. 中国科学院心理研究所. 中国科学院大学. 2023. |
入库方式： OAI收割
来源：心理研究所
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。