基于双因素模型公务员心理健康的研究：模型验证和心理灵活性中介作用
文献类型：学位论文
| 作者 | 雷淑兰 |
| 答辩日期 | 2024-06 |
| 文献子类 | 继续教育硕士 |
| 授予单位 | 中国科学院大学 |
| 授予地点 | 中国科学院心理研究所 |
| 其他责任者 | 李新颖 |
| 关键词 | 公务员 心理灵活性 心理健康 双因素模型 |
| 学位名称 | 理学硕士 |
| 学位专业 | 应用心理学 |
| 其他题名 | Research on Civil Servants' Mental Health Based on the Dual-Factor Model:Model Validation and the Mediating Role of Psychological Flexibility |
| 中文摘要 | From a positive psychology perspective, mental health is not merely the absence of negative psychological symptoms but represents a comprehensive positive psychological state, referred to as positive mental health. Positive psychology provides a new perspective, emphasizing the enhancement of an individual's overall mental health through cultivating positive psychological qualities. This study, grounded in positive psychology, primarily explores the mental health of civil servants by validating tools and theoretical models for assessing positive mental health, and thoroughly analyzing the relationships between mental health, psychological flexibility, and stress among this group. Study One tested the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) in a sample of 2,624 civil servants. The results showed that the item-total correlation coefficients of WEMWBS ranged from 0.752 to 0.911.Scree plot and parallel analysis indicated a one-factor model with factor loadings ranging from 0.762 to 0.918, explaining 73 .16% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a one-factor model (CFI=0.997, TLI=0.996, RMSEA=0.0330). WEMWBS positively correlated with the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS,，一0.710) and negatively with the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21)scores for depression, anxiety, stress, and overall (r=-0.512，-0.437，-0.488, -0.497 respectively). The Cronbach's alpha and Gunman split-half coefficients were 0.970 and 0.953, respectively, indicating good structural validity and internal consistency, confirming its applicability in measuring positive mental health among civil servants. Study Two focused on the adaptability of the dual-factor model of mental health among civil servants. Comparing single-factor and dual-factor models, the latter proved more suitable {CFI=0.998, TLI=0.997, RMSEA=0.0210). Based on the dual-factor model, the study categorized subjects, showing 74% as fully mentally healthy, 10.5% as susceptible, 8% as partially ill, and 7.5% as fully ill-a higher proportion of fully heap场individuals compared to previous studies of migrant workers, general populations in Zhejiang Province, and high school students. Latent profile analysis (LPA) further supported the dual-factor model by identifying three groups: a healthy-active group, a susceptible group, and a troubled group, reinforcing the model's validity. Study Three delved deeper into the relationships among stress, psychological flexibility, and mental health. Overall data revealed significant negative correlations between stress and positive mental health and positive correlations with negative mental health {anxiety and depression). Psychological flexibility showed significant positive correlations with positive mental health and negative with negative mental health, acting as a partial mediator.玩terms of mediation, psychological flexibility contributed 33.4% to positive mental health, 16.8% to anxiety, and 16.2% to depression. Analysis by theoretical groupings and latent profiles showed variable relationships and mediation effects across different groups, underscoring the need for nuanced discussion on the role of psychological flexibility in regulating stress and promoting mental health. In summary, this research offers new insights into the mental health of civil servants. It validates the applicability of the WEMWBS for assessing the mental health of this group, confizms the effectiveness of the dual-factor model, and highlights the crucial role of psychological flexibility in stress and mental health. These Endings are not only significant for precise assessment and intervention in civil servant mental health but also provide new directions and perspectives for future research. |
| 英文摘要 | 在积极心理学视角下，心理健康不仅仅是没有消极心理症状，而是一种全面积极的心理状态，被称之为积极心理健康。积极心理学提供了一种全新的视角，强调通过培养个体的积极心理品质来提高其整体心理健康水平。本研究基于积极心理学，主要探讨公务员群体的心理健康状况，通过验证积极心理健康测量工具和理论模型，深入分析了公务员群体的心理健康状况、心理灵活性在压力与心理健康之间的中介作用。 研究一在2624名公务员群体中通过使用沃里克一爱丁堡积极心理健康量表(WEMWBS)中文版量表，检验该量表在公务员群体中的有效性和可靠性。结果显示，WEMWBS的条巳总分相关系数在0.752至0.9 I 1之间，碎石图和平行分析显示单因子模型，因子载荷在0.762至0.918之间，解释了73.16%的总方差。验证性因素分析支持单因子模型(CFI = 0.997, TLI = 0.996RMSEA一0.0330) a WEMWBS与生活满意度量表((SWLS)正相关((r一0. 710)，与焦虑抑郁压力量表(DAS 5-21)各项分数(抑郁、焦虑、压力)负相关((r值分别为一0.512，-0.437，一。.488)，总分负相关(;=-0.497)。克隆巴赫。系数为0.970，古特曼分半系数为0.953。表明WEMWBS中文版能有效区分被试的心理健康状况，具有良好的结构效度和内部一致性。证实了其在测量公务员群体积极心理健康的适用性。 研究二专注于双因素心理健康模型在公务员群体中的适应性。通过比较单因素和双因素模型，结果表明双因素模型更适合(CFI一0.998, TLI一0.997, RMSEA一o. oalo}，同时基于双因素模型理论，对研究对象进行分组，研究结果表明公务员群体中74%为完全心理健康者、10.5%为易感者、8%为部分病态者、7.5%为完全病态者。完全心理健康群体比率远高于以往研究的农民工群体、浙江省一般群体、高中生群体。与此同时通过潜剖面分析(LPA)进一步进行验证，识别三组群体最适合，命名为健康积极群体、易感群体和困扰群体，进一步支持心理健康的双因素模型。针对两类分类的不同组别验证心理灵活性和压力得分差异，不同群体的心理灵活性和压力均差异显著。通过本研究，进一步提示公务员群体的心理测评中应增加积极方面的测评以更全面评估千部心理健康状况。 研究三深入探讨了压力、心理灵活性和心理健康之间的关系，基于整体数据发现压力与心理灵活性、积极心理健康之间存在显著的负相关与消极心理健康(焦虑抑郁)存在显著正相关，而心理灵活性与积极心理健康之间存在显著的正相关与消极心理健康(焦虑抑郁)存在显著负相关，心理灵活性在压力与积极心理健康和消极心理健康(焦虑抑郁)之间起到部分中介作用。在积极心理健康中心理灵活性的中介贡献率为33.4%;在焦虑和抑郁方面的中介贡献率分别为16.8%和16.2%，同时依据研究二的理论分组和潜在剖面分析的不同组别，分别探索压力、心理灵活性和心理健康之间的相关关系和中介效应检验，发现相关关系以理论分组的群体中，完全心理健康者和完全病态者，其结果与整体数据结果一致。而中介效应在理论分组的群体中，完全健康群体心理灵活性在积极心理健康、焦虑和抑郁的中介贡献率分别为13.7%, 8.96%和6.5%。而在完全病态群体中，心理灵活性对积极心理健康的中介贡献率达到31.7%，在抑郁方面表现为完全中介，在焦虑方面的贡献率为17.7%。而理论分组的易感群体和部分病态群体，相关性不显著，中介效应不显著。以潜在剖面分析的三组中，仅困扰组可能由于人数过少相关性和中介效应不显著。这表明心理灵活性在调节压力和促进心理健康方面的重要作用，但不同群体存在不同的情况，需要细致地讨论。 综上所述，本研究为研究公务员群体的心理健康提供新思路。验证了沃里克一爱丁堡积极心理健康量表(WEMWBS)在评估公务员群体中的适用性，证实了双因素心理健康模型的有效性，并揭示了心理灵活性在压力和心理健康方面的关键作用。这些发现不仅对于公务员心理健康的精准评估和精准干预具有实际意义，也为未来的研究提供了新的方向和视角。 |
| 语种 | 中文 |
| 源URL | [http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/48266]  |
| 专题 | 心理研究所_健康与遗传心理学研究室 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | 雷淑兰. 基于双因素模型公务员心理健康的研究：模型验证和心理灵活性中介作用[D]. 中国科学院心理研究所. 中国科学院大学. 2024. |
入库方式： OAI收割
来源：心理研究所
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。