内卷卷入与躺平行为的关系：习得性无助感的中介作用及社会 公平感和获得感的调节作用
文献类型：学位论文
| 作者 | 殷涌 |
| 答辩日期 | 2024-06 |
| 文献子类 | 继续教育硕士 |
| 授予单位 | 中国科学院大学 |
| 授予地点 | 中国科学院心理研究所 |
| 其他责任者 | 周洁 |
| 关键词 | 内卷卷入 躺平行为 习得性无助感 社会公平感 获得感 |
| 学位名称 | 理学硕士 |
| 学位专业 | 应用心理学 |
| 其他题名 | Impact of Involution Involvement on Lying Flat Behavior: The Mediation of Learned Helplessness and the Moderation of Social Justice Perception and Sense of Gain |
| 中文摘要 | Involution and lying flat, implying two different social phenomena, have gained widespread attention and discussion in Chinese society in recent years. Public opinion and academia tend to believe that both phenomena are harmful to the society and individuals, and resolution need to be sought. It is also believed that involution is one of the major causes that lead to lying flat. This paper is consisted of one pre-study and three studies, which were planned and executed from social psychology perspective, in the methods of interview and survey. The studies explored the impact of Involution involvement on lying flat behavior, revealed the mediation of learned helplessness and the moderation of social justice perception and sense of gain. The preliminary study clarified the concepts of involution and lying flat, the reasons for their occurrence, and their possible outcomes through semi-structured indepth interviews with 21 respondents, providing a foundation and direct support for subsequent studies. Study 1 adopted a cross-sectional questionnaire survey on 882 participants, examining the relationship between Involution involvement and lying flat behavior as well as the mediating effect of learned helplessness. The results showed that: (1) The total effect of Involution involvement on lying flat behavior was significant and negative; (2) The indirect effect between Involution involvement and lying flat behavior through the mediation of learned helplessness was significant and positive. Study 2 adopted longitudinal surveys to examine the possible directional interaction effects of Involution involvement, learned helplessness and lying flat behavior, and further separate the within-subject effects from between-subject effects from the results of Study 1. In practice, Study 2 conducted a three-round survey on the 882 participants in Study 1 within two months, and finally received a total of 456 qualified participants in all three rounds. Cross-lagged panel model results showed that: (1) Learned helplessness at the previous time point positively predicted the lying flat behavior at the subsequent time point; (2) The total effect, direct effect, and indirect effect through learned helplessness of Involution involvement on lying flat behavior were not significant. Random intercepts cross-lagged panel model results showed on within-subject level that: (1) Learned helplessness at the previous time point positively predicted the lying flat behavior at the subsequent time point; (2) The total effect, direct effect, and indirect effect through learned helplessness of Involution involvement on lying flat behavior were not significant. The inconsistencies between results of Study 1 and Study 2 could be due to the different nature between cross-sectional design and longitudinal design. Moreover, it might be also due to boundary conditions existing in the impact between Involution involvement and lying flat behavior. Therefore, Study 3 adopted a cross-sectional questionnaire survey on 255 participants, further examining the moderating effects of social justice perception and sense of gain on the mediation model of Involution involvement impacting lying flat behavior through learned helplessness. The results showed that: (1) Social justice perception had a moderating effect on the path of learned helplessness affecting lying flat behavior. The higher the social justice perception, the stronger the positive correlation between learned helplessness and lying flat behavior. (2) The indirect path from Involution involvement to lying flat behavior through learned helplessness was moderated by social justice perception. The higher the social justice perception, the stronger the positive indirect effect. (3) Sense of gain had a moderating effect on the path of learned helplessness affecting lying flat behavior. The lower the sense of gain, the stronger the positive correlation between learned helplessness and lying flat behavior. (4) The indirect path from Involution involvement to lying flat behavior through learned helplessness was moderated by sense of gain. The lower the sense of gain, the stronger the positive indirect effect. In conclusion, this paper deeply explored the relationship between Involution involvement and lying flat behavior, the mediating role of learned helplessness, and the moderating effects of social justice perception and sense of gain. It provided a new perspective to understand the two social phenomena and their underlying psychological mechanisms, provided implications to impact the involution environment and to alleviate the lying flat behavior from social governance point of view. |
| 英文摘要 | 内卷和躺平作为两种社会现象，近年来获得了中国社会广泛的关注与热议。社会舆论和学界大多认为这两种现象对社会以及个人会产生负面影响，应当寻找有效的解决之道。同时也有观点认为内卷可以导致躺平，是躺平的重要原因之一。本文以社会心理学的视角，采用质性访谈与问卷调查相结合的方法，通过一个预研究和三个研究探讨了内卷卷入与躺平行为之间的关系，并揭示了其中习得性无助感的中介作用及社会公平感和获得感的调节作用。 预研究通过对 21 名被访者的半结构化深度访谈，厘清了大众对内卷和躺平的概念、引起内卷和躺平的原因以及它们可能导致结果的理解和认识，为后续正式研究提供了基础和直接的材料支撑。 研究一采用横断面问卷调查法对 882 名被试进行了调查，检验内卷卷入与躺平行为的关系以及习得性无助感的中介作用。结果表明：（1）内卷卷入负向影响躺平行为；（2）内卷卷入通过习得性无助感的中介作用正向影响躺平行为。 研究二进一步采用纵向追踪问卷调查，考察内卷卷入、习得性无助感和躺平行为之间可能的方向关系，并进一步分离研究一结果中的个体间效应和个体内效应。因此，研究二对研究一的882名被试进行了为期两个月、共三次追踪，最终三轮均追踪到的合格被试共456 名。交叉滞后分析结果表明：（1）前一时点的习得性无助感正向预测后一时点的躺平行为；（2）内卷卷入对躺平行为的总效应、直接效应以及通过习得性无助感的中介效应均不显著。随机截距交叉滞后分析结果表明：在个体内水平上，（1）前一时点的习得性无助感正向预测 后一时点的躺平行为；（2）内卷卷入对躺平行为的总效应、直接效应以及通过习得性无助感的中介效应均不显著。 由于研究一与研究二的结果并不完全一致，除了横断面与纵向追踪研究的差异，还可能因为内卷卷入对躺平行为的影响及其机制存在边界条件。因此，研究三仍采用横断面问卷调查法对 255 名被试进行了调查，进一步考察社会公平感和获得感对内卷卷入通过习得性无助感影响躺平行为的中介模型的调节作用。结果表明：（1）习得性无助感正向影响躺平行为的路径受到社会公平感的调节；社会公平感越高，习得性无助感与躺平行为间的正向关系越强。（2）内卷卷入通过习得性无助感影响躺平行为的中介路径亦受到社会公平感的调节； 社会公平感越高，该正向中介效应越强。（3）习得性无助感正向影响躺平行为的路径受到获得感的调节；获得感越低，习得性无助感与躺平行为间的正向关系越强。（4）内卷卷入通过习得性无助感影响躺平行为的中介路径亦受到获得 感的调节；获得感越低，该正向中介效应越强。 综上，本文对内卷卷入与躺平行为的关系及其中习得性无助感的中介作用以及社会公平感和获得感的调节作用进行了深入探讨，为更清晰理解内卷与躺平两种社会现象间的关系及其背后的心理机制提供了新的视角，对社会治理实践中进行内卷氛围的引导和躺平行为的疏解也有一定的启示意义。 |
| 语种 | 中文 |
| 源URL | [http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/48252]  |
| 专题 | 心理研究所_社会与工程心理学研究室 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | 殷涌. 内卷卷入与躺平行为的关系：习得性无助感的中介作用及社会 公平感和获得感的调节作用[D]. 中国科学院心理研究所. 中国科学院大学. 2024. |
入库方式： OAI收割
来源：心理研究所
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。