Spatial benefit difference of fertilizer reduction and substitution policy based on grid scale: A case study of the Heihe River Basin
文献类型:期刊论文
作者 | Liu, Guijun2,3,4; Wang, Huimin2,3; Liu, Gang2,3; Li, Shengshen1; Wu, Feng4 |
刊名 | JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
![]() |
出版日期 | 2024-12-01 |
卷号 | 371页码:123114 |
关键词 | Agriculture green development Organic fertilizer Land use Spatial heterogeneity Environmental impacts |
DOI | 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123114 |
产权排序 | 3 |
文献子类 | Article |
英文摘要 | Agriculture green development faces the challenge of balancing the application of both organic and chemical fertilizers. Formulating effective policies to harmonize these applications is essential for ensuring food security and environmental sustainability. However, there is a lack of studies investigating the economic and environmental benefits of policy implementation at the grid scale, and insufficient research has been conducted on the subsequent impacts these policies have on diverse crops. Therefore, this paper develops the SIMPLE-G-Heihe model to simulate the impacts of green agricultural policies on multiple crops planting in arid regions. This model addresses limitations found in the SIMPLE-G model, which supported a single crop and lacked organic fertilizer substitution simulation. The results show that: (1) Merely increasing subsidies for organic fertilizers is insufficient to significantly enhance yields, and improving the efficiency of fertilizer utilization should also be emphasized. (2) Combining improvements in fertilizer technology with subsidies for organic fertilizers can concurrently support economic advancement and environmental mitigation. Research indicates that integrating a 3% organic fertilizer subsidy with an 8% improvement in chemical fertilizer technology increases vegetable output value by 0.27% and reduces N2O emissions by 1.09%. (3) The upstream areas of the Heihe River Basin show a significant reduction in fertilizer use. Fertilizer input is mainly reduced for vegetables in the upstream areas, while for wheat and maize, the reduction is primarily in the midstream and upstream areas. The findings discuss the spatial heterogeneity and flexibility of policy impacts, providing valuable insights for the implementation of green agriculture strategies in China. |
WOS关键词 | SOIL ; MANAGEMENT ; IMPACTS ; SYSTEM ; CHINA |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology |
WOS记录号 | WOS:001351204100001 |
源URL | [http://ir.igsnrr.ac.cn/handle/311030/209510] ![]() |
专题 | 陆地表层格局与模拟院重点实验室_外文论文 |
通讯作者 | Liu, Gang; Wu, Feng |
作者单位 | 1.Politecn Milan, I-20133 Milan, Italy 2.Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China 3.Tianjin Univ, Lab Computat & Analyt Complex Management Syst CACM, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China 4.Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Land Surface Pattern & Simulat, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Liu, Guijun,Wang, Huimin,Liu, Gang,et al. Spatial benefit difference of fertilizer reduction and substitution policy based on grid scale: A case study of the Heihe River Basin[J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT,2024,371:123114. |
APA | Liu, Guijun,Wang, Huimin,Liu, Gang,Li, Shengshen,&Wu, Feng.(2024).Spatial benefit difference of fertilizer reduction and substitution policy based on grid scale: A case study of the Heihe River Basin.JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT,371,123114. |
MLA | Liu, Guijun,et al."Spatial benefit difference of fertilizer reduction and substitution policy based on grid scale: A case study of the Heihe River Basin".JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 371(2024):123114. |
入库方式: OAI收割
来源:地理科学与资源研究所
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。